In polls taken in non friendly areas of the world, it is astounding the digree of support for Hillary, Obama, Al Gore, John Kerry among anti American groups.
Shouldn't that wake up the Democratic Party?
2007-10-30 02:27:08 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
NOTE : To Berlytea....
No,...You enjoy your Freedom!
Just the sort of comment I would expect from a clueless spoiled American child.
We don't "enjoy" war but it becomes necessary at times. The left wants to hide their heads in the sand and pretend it will all go away. Like Bill Clinton did for 8 years while all around us the extremests were building their forces and telling us exactly what they were planning.
Enjoy your freedom, that others have paid for....and get back to class.
2007-10-30 02:45:52 · update #1
Response # 2
My hat off to your father the Marine. I think he would know what I am talking about. As for "grown woman" ...I have a daughter 32, she began to make sense politicaly just recently. I think you still have a few years of maturing to do. This war has been stewing for at least 12 years. Remember after the cease fire in 91, there was a no fly zone in two areas of Iraq. Saddam violated it scores of times. Any one of those violations gave us the right under that agreement to continue the war there. I had a good friend nearly shot out of the sky by an Iraqi SAM missle in 98. You are wrong to be "against" any war that your country is involved in. If you are a true patriot.
.
2007-10-30 09:37:03 · update #2
You would think it would wake them up. Democrats are weak on terror, Clinton let Bin Laden escape. The Clintons time and time again widdled the military down to a fraction of its former self when they were in office. There are hundreds of cases where the Clintons and staff disrespected the honor guard that served in the White House. They hate the military, and thus will be weak on terror. One thing they will do is make this country more reliant on government. i.e socialism= Baby bonds, socialized health care, government 401K.
We need less government involvement.
2007-10-30 02:44:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
WOW seek what an thrilling ballot. Who took it? are you able to help your assertion? How have been those "terrorist" labeled and regarded? hey you, are you a terrorist, come right here I have been given a ballot for ya. "In polls taken in non friendly aspects of the international" would not say terrorist companies international polled. assume those "non friendly aspects" are ultimately looking forward to working with the U. S. in deliver actual peace and calm to their region. Who did this ballot and the place will we stumble on it so we are able to view it? easily you probably did no longer make it up and attempting to bypass off fake and fraudulent advice
2016-10-03 00:30:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umm yeah. Considering you do not provide anything to support your accusation, I will take it as you made it up.
Additionally you provide no details on your accusations as far as where this supposed poll took place. You also state that the poll was taken in non friendly areas of the world? What exactly do you mean by non friendly? Also remember the terrorists that we should be fearing are extremists or fundamentalists and not representative of the majority of the country they hail from.
Search_Rescue - Since you felt the need to respond and degrade one of the posters, how about responding to my post and providing something to support your accusation.
2007-10-30 02:39:16 · answer #3 · answered by labken1817 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You should get your head checked...no reason to spread false information like that, any free thinker can tell that your just another part of the machine. If the "terrorists" are enjoying ANY U.S. president, I think that it would be Bush, seeing as he's a fabulous catalyst for recruitment...
2007-10-30 03:08:51 · answer #4 · answered by jeneK 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Rubbish. OBL loves Bush and always has. He has found someone both stupid enough and arrogant enough to lift his cause. Bush has made him a hero instead of a villian. Only a republican will give him the clash of fundamentalism that he craves. Look into the mirror and who do you see - another fundy staring back at thee.
2007-10-31 00:42:00 · answer #5 · answered by nicelyevolve 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
As "Big Brother"?
Would you let "Small brother " kick you on the butts?
Or tell "Small brother - sit down and keep quiet"
With " Children are to be seen and not to be heard"
Then say "Open the mouth and say Aaah"
Have a teaspoonful of salt.
In time come and kick me on the butts.
What do you think?
So how to be the Boss?
2007-10-30 22:11:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe these people that have polled feel that they could comfortably work with Hillary or Obama to resolve some issues....Anything wrong with that? Or would you rather we just continue to blow up innocent people worldwide, including our own?
2007-10-30 16:25:24 · answer #7 · answered by rachael b 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yeah, it has always made me wonder..
I recall that during the '04 election, a comment attributed to OBL about the dangers of a Bush reelection.
Now if HE didn't want the President re-elected, it should have sent a huge signal to Lib's everywhere.
It was ignored as usual.
2007-10-30 02:51:29 · answer #8 · answered by Mark A 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Still afraid of the cave dwelling rock chuckers, huh? The more you undermine our civil liberties out of irrational fear of terrorists, the more the terrorists win. If we lose what we're fighting for, we fight for nothing. Idiots!
2007-10-30 04:19:27 · answer #9 · answered by McCains InSane 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If terrorists are polled, they have to pick someone. Those are the names people all over the world are familiar with. If Bush was on the list, they would have picked him. Use your head.
2007-10-30 02:35:54 · answer #10 · answered by notyou311 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋