English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.casio.com/products/Cameras/Exilim_Zoom/EX-Z1080BK/

2007-10-30 01:57:45 · 7 answers · asked by pitakid10 3 in Consumer Electronics Cameras

7 answers

I think it depends on what you are looking for. Do you want a camera or something to make video recording for YouTube because this seems to be the hype behind this camera. I paid a similar amount for a similar point and shoot camera about a year ago and was not really happy with the quality of the pictures. The megapixels are 5.0 on the camera I've got but because of the zoom being inside the camera rather than a separate lens that attachs to the camera I feel like I lose a lot of quality in pictures when I want to enlarge them. Also I cannot get clear pictures on actions shots like for my son playing baseball or hockey. I invested recently in a very good quality DSLR Canon, it is pricey but well worth the money for the excellent pictures I am getting now. So decide if you want a good camera for good pictures or a camcorder for videos. That camera is going to give you like 10 minutes of video before you have to change memory cards or download. You will probably get decent pictures if you are just a casual photographer but I wouldn't buy it if it is video you are looking at. Oh and don't be sucked in by the 10.1 megapixels. Professionals use cameras with less megapixels and still get excellent quality pictures. It isn't always the equipment, it's how you use it!

2007-10-30 03:16:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would hesitate to judge a camera by its manufacturer's website- hardly an objective viewpoint. Having said that, it may well be worth the money. Check out a more objective site, such as Cnet.com for reviews and what users have to say about the camera. And while more pixels doesn't guarantee higher quality, the converse isn't necessarily true either. My preference would be to buy a camera from a "traditional" camera manufacturer, such as Canon and Nikon.

2007-10-30 03:12:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Before rushing out to buy a digicam with high megapixels IMO you should read "The Pros & Cons of Pixel Packing" in the Nov. 2007 issue of Shutterbug Magazine (available at shutterbug.com). Although not a "scientific test" per se, it still offers excellent information.

Did you notice the reference to "really large prints up to 8x10" in the verbiage about the camera? 8x10 really isn't all that large.

2007-10-30 02:18:49 · answer #3 · answered by EDWIN 7 · 0 0

the holga digital camera has little or no to do with the 'classic' look you're conversing approximately. the vignetting (darkish borders around edges of photo) are a special function of the holga even regardless of the undeniable fact that that's no longer uniform from digital camera to digital camera. the 'classic' look actual comes from flow-processing coloration action picture in slide action picture chemical substances. that's the way you get those extraordinary/cool blue and eco-friendly coloration casts. yet meaning you are able to desire to purchase all the chemical substances your self and function a place to boost them. in case you drop your action picture off at walmart it is going to seem like a number of different coloration action picture from the different digital camera. you are able to actual reflect a number of those coloration casts by using incorrectly processing coloration action picture in primary coloration (c-forty-one) chemical substances. fluctuating chemical temperatures in the course of processing often finally ends up in coloration casts. jointly as i admire holgas, they do no longer look to be the main functional digital camera contained in the international. in case you have the money to purchase the chemical substances (persistently) and the time and area to procedure it i could say opt for it. if no longer i think of you would be upset with how 'hassle-free' your action picture comes out.

2017-01-04 14:44:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm gonna go with no on this one, for that price you should be able to get more optical zoom not so many megapixels, megapixels only make a difference in printing.

2007-10-30 04:25:09 · answer #5 · answered by Misses Mia Wallace 5 · 0 0

more is not always better,buy camera in your price range,get one that fit your needs,these high priced cameras are geared towards pros not everyday users.

2007-10-30 02:50:40 · answer #6 · answered by dj 2 · 0 0

Try comforstyles.com

2007-10-30 03:50:29 · answer #7 · answered by tom p 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers