Do you think you should have been asked about the establishment of large ethnic communities in the UK?

Question

For example, all major parties are giving unstinting support to the mass multi million Islamic communities growing in the UK. Most members of these communities are against the UK but live here, can anybody explain why we allowed these communities to establish themselves in the UK in the first place?. Democratic Holland has allowed a demonstration against this recently.

I am aware many will not believe this but I am not against Islamic people; however I think Islamic politics are 1000s of years old and will not change perhaps in 100s of years. Look at the actions of Islamic doctors for example and the 7/7 lunatics. Anyhow, my question is: why did politicians do this without agreement from the indigenous British?

Shanahan, no answer just sarcasm, I am not interested in football except the world cup when I support England. Who do you support Iran? I don't need to ask if you support George Galloway

Politics guy, I really thought you at least read the news:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/07/01/london.alert/index.html?eref=yahoo

Shanahan sorry perhaps I did miss this election manifesto quote:

VOTE NEW LABOUR AND WE WILL BRING 2 MILLION MUSLIMS AND OTHERS INTO THE UK.

For the pedantic, of course "ethnic communities" is euphemistic and means ethnically foreign communities..

Answer 1

well it is our country and the government is suposed to work for us!! so yes of course we should have been consulted first. and how STUPID!! can any government get!! than to wage a war with a Muslim country and at the same time!! allow that countrys angy young men to flood over our borders during that war in the hundreds of thousands???? this government are the most incompitent bunch of tossers we have ever had in power. they realy cant do the job. a five year old child would show more sense. and it doesnt seem to bother them one! iota!!! that container loads of weapons are currently being smuggled into Britain..... (hundreds of thousands of muslims. containers full of weapons)....HELLO!!! any one in the home office seeing a pattern here??? or did i lose you after 'good morning'.

Answer 2

There's just a couple of things wrong with your question.

Firstly, where are these, "mass multi million Islamic communities growing in the UK". Secondly, for all that you say about not having anything against, "Islamic people" (that would be Muslims then!), you still can't grasp that, "the indigenous British", can be Muslim too. Lastly, you say "look at the actions of Islamic doctors for example and the 7/7 lunatics". What of them? Are we judge a whole religion by a few (very few) individuals who bombed London? And as for Muslim doctors, where's your evidence?

I think you should stop reading the Daily Mail. If you want change to happen, then stand for election.

***EDIT***

Sam J, sure he got several answers from me. The first was that there are not the "multi million Islamic communities", that he claims there are. I also pointed out that the, "indigenous British" are Muslims too and that we should not use the actions of a few to judge the many.

Seems I was not the only one to make a reference to the Daily Mail, tank also did so. It's because it's the kind of comic people like you read; the truth hurts doesn't it. Now what was it you claim I wrote? Oh yes, here it is, "anti democratic pseudo intellectual excuses." My you must have been up all night with your dictionary and cup of Ovaltine! And what points did you make in your post exactly? None, other than to brownnose your mate of course, "Well asked Mike". I've never laughed so much in my life.

***EDIT 2****

Wow, two doctors bomb Glasgow airport, I guess my argument falls down then! For your information, they were not Muslims as the taking of innocent life is forbidden in Islam . And that is exactly the same reason why Muslims in this country cannot be judged by the actions of those on 7/7, because they weren't Muslims. Thanks for proving my point.

Answer 3

Shanahan and politics guy make anti democratic pseudo intellectual excuses for the disgraceful trick called mass immigration played on the UK people.Note the pathetic "Daily Mail " mantra

Well asked Mike, the fact that you did not get an answer other than "you voted for them" or "Daily Mail" or the most pathetic one "stick to football" proves you have a good point

Answer 4

The rioters who attacked the police, burned properties and looted shops had no longer something to do with attempting to genuine social wrongs. they're thugs who's sole aim in existence is to dedicate crime, arson and violence. some even who have been claiming to chat for the human beings of Tottenham even pronounced that the insurrection became right into a symptom of simmering discontent. the completed section is plagued via gangs to blame for knife crimes gun crimes. None deserve any sympathy for making their very own homeless, yet need to be locked up without the dogooders having any say in any appreciate. Labour MP ABBOTT attempted to decrease this behaviour, by way of governments physique of techniques and cuts. What a plonker of a woman.

Answer 5

there has been lots of ethnic groups coming into Britain for two thousand years. the Romans the viking the Saxons the Normans ans so on. seems to me that the Romans the vikings and the Normans did influence Britain for the better by the way. it was not so long ago really that there was no Christians in Britain so were the Christian immigrants seen the same way as the Islamic immigrants by the Daily Mail no they were not because the Daily Scare was not set up yet. if it was you would have it going on about them Christian immigrants changing Britain. and did they do some good in Britain after all. i think you will find there was some bad elements in that lot as well.

Answer 6

We should have been consulted on this issue of course we should, but The answer why we werent is because we are no longer a democracy.

These communities are here now and I dont think we can move them out easily. The whole mass immigration issue has changed our country beyond recognition and the only ones to feel the benefits are the wealthy businessmen and politicians. The man in the street just gets the pain!

Answer 7

You were consulted at the last general election - Labour made their policies quite clear - I chose not to vote for them. Their strategy on immigration has been clear for some time - they are in favour of letting more people in, and then refuse to look toward an integrationalist approach to community co-hension: they have allowed the ghettoisation of communities, especially Asian. On top of that they go and start a war with a country who shares its religion with a large number of its own citizens.

You see, there is something called cause and effect - Britain has been interfering with Middle East relations for years, and is (quite rightly) pro-Israel, which most of the Eastern World is not. That is fine, but to top it off with open immigration strategies for people from those countries is going to lead to difficulties, and to then go to war is bound to lead to the situation that we have now.

Some people call it joined-up thinking. The government calls it 'something we didn't really consider in any depth'.

Answer 8

I would think the Brits would want to be asked. I know for a livid fact that the American People were not asked and I am also pretty sure they are very angrey they were not.

Answer 9

i am sure in the eyes of New Labour, all is going according to plan And when things turn really nasty they will emigrate with their undeserved plunder.

Answer 10

I think there should have at least been a referendum on the subject.