im sure their would be a lot of kiddies who would be quite distraught if you told them 'santy aint comin this year little jonny'
2007-10-29 03:09:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by brassmunkiee 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
IT'S ABOUT TIME.
Maybe the old texts were trying to tell us something about the nature of time that we are only now scientifically discovering.
Turns out, time is a mind game, it's a good one, but that's all it is. Physicists are figuring out things about time we would never have expected.
Neither the past nor the future are at all accessible to us, except as an idea that we are thinking in the present moment. You have never done, touched, moved, or changed anything in the past or future. Never Ever. Everything that has ever been done has happened in this vast traveling moment we call "right now."
Everyone "knows" you can remember the past, but you can't change it. And "obviously" we don't know what will happen exactly in the future, but you can take action to change it. Right? Wrong.
According to physicists, there is no reason why we couldn't "remember" in both directions, or change things in either (or neither) direction.
2007-10-29 10:41:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by thenwhen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that you have misquoted the scripture what it actually says is:
Rev 21:6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
Rev 22:13 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.
He is the beginning and the end. Not that he has no beginning or end
So to answer your question no it isn't true therefore your second statement is also false.
That is one problem with people today they misquote or twist the word to fit their own agenda
2007-10-29 10:22:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bride of Christ 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Revelation 22:13 is the verse that references what you are talking about. It isn't saying that He didn't have a beginning and end, but that God transcends everything else. A misquoting of that verse does not prove that God does not exist.
2007-10-29 10:12:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by mlcros 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Aesity means self-existence. Aesity explains the metaphysical nature of God as a purely self-existent being that exists in complete actuality. God is not a being that is created by another god; neither does God create himself into existence. Rather, God has always existed as an unchanging, completely actualized being.
God has his Being of himself and to himself such that he is Absolute being and the definition of existence.
Since God’s essence is his nature and God’s existence is the same as his essence it follows that God is existence.
2007-10-29 13:34:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by cashelmara 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Time is within God, thus He is infinity. He tells us that He is the alpha and omega, the beginning and the end. A circle has no beginning or end but it exists.
2007-10-29 10:11:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sharon M 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Throughout the history of civilization , thousands of gods began and ended. Of course , each new god was the real god , and replaced the one that used to be the real god . Then the real real god comes along and boots him out .
On and on and on . The batch of real gods that we have now are wearing rather thin, and will be replaced by more never-ending real gods .
2007-10-29 10:19:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just because we can't wrap our heads around God's infinity doesn't make Him not exist. Things can exist independently of our understanding.
2007-10-29 10:10:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kiwi 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
the difference beteween the two is that god always existed while while the things we talk about that never existed has a creation point
2007-10-29 10:09:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by thinking 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Either it never exists or existed for all time (beyond time).
~ Eric Putkonen
2007-10-29 10:11:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋