English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Considering how the death tolls are going down.

2007-10-27 15:24:28 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Dang,I only asked this question 10 minutes ago.

2007-10-27 15:35:36 · update #1

21 answers

Yea but no-one else will admit it.

Vet-USAF

2007-10-27 15:27:03 · answer #1 · answered by ฉันรักเบ้า 7 · 8 4

I guess it all depends on what you think is better.
If you chart the following casualties, you will find some apparent cyclic casualties.
Facts:
1) May 2007 was actually the third worst month historically.
2) October 2007 had 3 better months historically
3) September 2007 had 26 better months historically.
4) August 2007 had 88 better months.

So, statistically you're incorrect. Wishful thining wise, that's all up to you

Month US UK Other* Total Avg Days
Mar-03 65 27 92 7.67 12
Apr-03 74 6 80 2.67 30
May-03 37 4 1 42 1.35 31
Jun-03 30 6 36 1.2 30
Jul-03 48 1 49 1.58 31
Aug-03 35 6 2 43 1.39 31
Sep-03 31 1 1 33 1.1 30
Oct-03 44 1 2 47 1.52 31
Nov-03 82 1 27 110 3.67 30
Dec-03 40 8 48 1.55 31
Jan-04 47 5 52 1.68 31
Feb-04 20 1 2 23 0.79 29
Mar-04 52 52 1.68 31
Apr-04 135 5 140 4.67 30
May-04 80 4 84 2.71 31
Jun-04 42 1 7 50 1.67 30
Jul-04 54 1 3 58 1.87 31
Aug-04 66 4 5 75 2.42 31
Sep-04 80 3 4 87 2.9 30
Oct-04 64 2 2 68 2.19 31
Nov-04 137 4 141 4.7 30
Dec-04 72 1 3 76 2.45 31
Jan-05 107 10 10 127 4.1 31
Feb-05 58 2 60 2.14 28
Mar-05 35 1 3 39 1.26 31
Apr-05 52 52 1.73 30
May-05 80 2 6 88 2.84 31
Jun-05 78 1 4 83 2.77 30
Jul-05 54 3 1 58 1.87 31
Aug-05 85 85 2.74 31
Sep-05 49 3 52 1.73 30
Oct-05 96 2 1 99 3.19 31
Nov-05 84 1 1 86 2.87 30
Dec-05 68 68 2.19 31
Jan-06 62 2 64 2.06 31
Feb-06 55 3 58 2.07 28
Mar-06 31 2 33 1.06 31
Apr-06 76 1 5 82 2.73 30
May-06 69 9 1 79 2.55 31
Jun-06 61 2 63 2.1 30
Jul-06 43 1 2 46 1.48 31
Aug-06 65 1 66 2.13 31
Sep-06 72 3 2 77 2.57 30
Oct-06 106 2 2 110 3.55 31
Nov-06 70 6 2 78 2.6 30
Dec-06 112 1 2 115 3.71 31
Jan-07 83 3 86 2.77 31
Feb-07 81 3 1 85 3.04 28
Mar-07 81 1 82 2.65 31
Apr-07 104 12 1 117 3.9 30
May-07 126 3 2 131 4.23 31
Jun-07 101 7 108 3.6 30
Jul-07 78 8 1 87 2.81 31
Aug-07 84 4 88 2.84 31
Sep-07 65 2 2 69 2.3 30
Oct-07 32 1 1 34 1.26 27

2007-10-27 15:54:35 · answer #2 · answered by Bubba Rogers 3 · 1 3

*This is from the official report from the Iraqis* THEY WANT US TO STAY.
But since Bush is leaving office in a bit, he's slowly pulling out. The Iraqis were practically on their hands and knees begging us to stay (which is why we're still in), because until they have the resources to hold their own land America will be needed to the stop terrorists. Otherwise it will become a chaotic hell-hole all over again.

2007-10-28 02:14:42 · answer #3 · answered by General Custer 2 · 1 0

expensive boy, i'm particular you be conscious of the respond, why do no longer you let us know, in spite of everything you served interior the U. S. military, and in a precise secret Israeli police unit, let us know. BTW i don't be conscious of how Israel permit you bypass, you're an Israeli national treasure. Is it real what they are asserting on YA which you're a Muslim posing as a Jew?

2016-10-14 05:50:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

PEOPLE ON THIS SITE HAVE NO ****** IDEA WHATS GOING ON OVER THERE, THEY DONT HAVE A ****** CLUE.

1# BECAUSE THEY HAVENT BEEN OVER THERE AND SEEN AND DONE THE THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE DONE TOO FIGHT FOR ONES COUNTRY AND ESTABLISH A IRAQIE GOVERNMENT, SO THAT PEOPLE LIKE THE ONES ON THIS PAGE CAN POST **** THAT THEY DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT THERE TALKIN ABOUT!!

2#THEY LESION TOO EVERY DAMN THING THAT COMES OUT OF THE LIBS MOUTH

-------LESION TOO WHAT A RANGER HAS TO SAY ABOUT IRAQ (SOMEONE THATS ACTUALLY BEEN OVER THERE!!)-------

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wh1dWrf-k_E

2007-10-27 17:16:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

shhhh.... the democrats will get mad.lol yes things at the moment are getting better. By listening to the main stream liberal media you would never know the difference. I never doubted our brave men and women of the U.S. armed services. The difference is the pentagon is leaving politics out and letting the soldiers do their job.

2007-10-27 15:39:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

What do you expect?

We kill 15 bad guys a day, out of 30,000,000 citizens... At a cost of $300,000,000.oo

We are currently in a "surge" where 32,000 soldiers are on "in theatre". We normally have 30,000 in theatre. The first days of this war were the only time 100% of our military was doing somethign other than sitting at a base.

Eventually there wont be anymore criminals, or they will decide to sit back and wait untill we are gone.

Iraq will keep getting better, and probably stabalize once there arent foreigners there (Including us) playing the role as police.

It wasnt the occupying British that got America settled into a stable political system was it?

When foreigners patrol city streets with heavy weaponry, people get angry. Period. That cannot be argued.

When a population is 75% under the age of 18 and largely made of MALES, you CREATE problems for the future by introducing that anger created by a foriegn occupancy. NOt that they will fight and die now, but anger against US forces will be long in their minds.

While kidnappings and murders taking place from muslim on muslim crime takes place, that is urban legend to them. It has no where near the negative effect of a simple foreign patrol down their street whio is viewed as a man from halfway aroudn the world who has come to take away something.


If we wanted things to get better. We would have had a 2x as powerful initial military campaign, killed saddam 2x as fast, and LEFT by now as soon as putting up a quick govt.

As far as many of us are concerned, the war has been won, and is over. Using soldiers as police is a drag-on-forever delay for who knows what.

2007-10-27 15:26:42 · answer #7 · answered by vote_usa_first 7 · 5 6

Better than what? It was more stable under Saddam and he was a monster!. Lok at the mess the occupiers have made and the thousands of deaths and injuries.

2007-10-27 19:14:57 · answer #8 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0 3

Just follow the liberal news, if there not talking about Iraq we must be doing better.

2007-10-27 15:36:38 · answer #9 · answered by labdoctor 5 · 4 3

The surge is working ..Bush was right

2007-10-27 20:29:10 · answer #10 · answered by Peiper 5 · 2 0

If you notice the news media is not reporting on it now. Why you ask? they said that there is not bad things to report only good and we do not want that.

So there you have it.

2007-10-27 15:28:09 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

fedest.com, questions and answers