In 2005 Bush signed a formal agreement without the approval of Congress that would create "security and prosperity of partnership of North America." It is not a trade agreement, it is an open borders policy with Canada and Mexico for the removal of America's sovereignty. Then there will be a new currency, like the Euro in Europe, called the Amero. I think we've put this on ourselves with Americans nagging about illegal immigrants and national security. What do you think?
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965
2007-10-27 07:19:17 · 18 answers · asked by k20 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
This is nothing more than propaganda by conspiracy theorists and many vocal Ron Paul-supporters. The North American Union will never replace the USA nor has the EU replaced its member countries.
2007-10-27 07:24:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 8⤋
It won't happen soon; it is a longer term plan by the corporations, the neo-con, globalist Bush dynasty, and the liberal, globalist Clinton dynasty. IF the Clintons get in the White HOuse again, the chances of the NAU becoing a reality greatly increase. I don't understand your point about "Americans nagging about illegal immigrants and national security."
Allowing hordes of third world immigrants into the USA is part of the globalists plan to destroy our national identity and unity.
2007-10-27 09:02:03 · answer #2 · answered by Shane 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Dar is correct in what she is saying. However think of DEMOCRACY as incorporated socialist blanket. Incorporated being the key word here. Something that is "legal" may not necessarily be "lawful" and vice versa. An example. Can an Incorporated business entity operate pretty well anywhere in the world now? The answer is YES. if you write up a "CORPORATE" agreement between(example only) "KANSAS CITY MO.(which is in fact INCORPORATED) and say LAZARO CARDENAS MEXICO for instance.) is this "unconstitiutional"? YES. But is it "Illegal"? NO. Because it is a "CORPORATE BUSINESS AGREEMENT". so is DEMOCRACY truly represntative of the PEOPLE or is it representative of that which is believed to be that "Best for the common good"? I believe their ideology on it is the latter of the two. The people(being in an apathetic slumber due to the amount of confusion involved, and on purpose mind you.) Do not understand nor wish to rock the boat, so to speak, in fear of the consequences they may very well face.
2007-10-27 07:48:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
They are certainly trying to do so. Which is probably the reason why they are destroying the US dollar as we speak. Good reason to get rid of the Federal Reserve also!
What does Americans wanting their laws enforced have to do with the NAU? I don't see any correlation. I DO see the fact that the elite were trying to give illegal aliens amnesty to help erase the border...National security is only a smoke screen to keep people unaware of what they are really doing.
2007-10-27 07:26:44 · answer #4 · answered by Fedup Veteran 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. The majority of Americans are completely against this ever happening. Oklahoma has already told them flat out not to even think of bringing the so called Superhighway through here. Americans have every right to nag about illegal immigrants and national security. Both should be of enormous concern to every American.
2007-10-27 10:02:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think they will avoid the money and flag bit, as Britain did, then say, as Britain is saying, that they aren't doing anything that needs Congressional or citizen approval. However, UNLIKE Britain, our constitution requires ratification of treaties, and I think the SPP agreement is unconstitutional.
2007-10-27 07:32:33 · answer #6 · answered by DAR 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I see a lot of hype and hoopla but no real substance.
I am reminded of the people in Indiana so paranoid about an imminent UN takeover of the US 15 years ago that they were destroying highway signs.
2007-10-27 07:26:56 · answer #7 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It will not happen in the next twenty years...
BTW, the idea of European Community pooped up more than 30 years ago. Still it is not entirely realized. Similarly anything comparable in America will take a lot
2007-10-27 07:23:44 · answer #8 · answered by blapath 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
No way. too many American citizens will revolt on that crap. We don't want Mexican trucks or drivers here at all. The Teamsters will take care of it, I'm sure. And the fact that Americans are tired of being taken advantage of is not nagging, it is spreading the truth.
2007-10-27 14:26:01 · answer #9 · answered by Ms.L.A. 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
it will not work i'm american and i don't think we should replace our president's picture on our bill and even if some how to be negotiated Mexico will not be included
2007-10-27 07:45:45 · answer #10 · answered by MAN 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Makes no difference as NAFTA constituents are colonies of USA . It is an internal document
2007-10-27 07:23:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋