2007-10-27 05:34:29 · 13 answers · asked by dancing_queen0707 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No way!
2007-10-27 05:36:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
the problem is only two countries (the UK and US) are willing to do anything major. Afghanistan is a case in point the UK and US provide the vast majority of combat troops and equipment yet other key members provide very little i.e. Germany provides a fare few non-combat troops and France, well we know all about their fighting record. they provide practically nothing despite being a permanent member of the UN security council and NATO. there are only a few countries capable of putting troops overseas and even fewer willing to. Its not about to collapse it just needs reordering whereby countries are complied to help out in NATO missions. i have long thought that, although this will never happen, that continental Europe should hand over its defence budget to the UK and then we'll sort it all out for them as they clearly can't.
2007-10-27 15:22:52 · answer #2 · answered by <><><> 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. In fact NATO is growing still between the Partnership for Peace program and Mediteranian Dialogue programs.
NATO often fills the roles that UN cannont or will not fill.
2007-10-27 12:52:06 · answer #3 · answered by mnbvcxz52773 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
well who would notice??? NATO has two fighting forces. Britain and America. the rest just hide away untill its all over. most countrys are under the impression!!!! that Nato is just the UK and the US!!
2007-10-27 17:29:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
N O, NATO(North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is
very strong!!!
2007-10-27 12:46:47 · answer #5 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
In afgan there are other countries chipping in the danes, the dutch and the canadians are doing some hard fighting in Kandarhar province. Although there are lot that could do more, such as removing their caveats.
2007-10-30 08:37:19 · answer #6 · answered by Group Captain Lionel Mandrake 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't think so.
But the mystery is only for solving the blunders and slip-ups with human errors created back in the past being expose with time after the mystery of us-911.
Revealation 16.16
What do you think?
2007-10-28 00:09:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it will remain just as insignificant as it always has where conflict is concerned. But I will give credit to bringing attention to countries that need immediate aid. I personally wish we would stop funding the whole thing and move it to either Palestine or Israel to give them a fresh approach to real problems.
Sorry I was thinking of the UN. My bad.
2007-10-27 12:38:29 · answer #8 · answered by rance42 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hope so! What good is nato,or for that matter the U N to the U S We don't need you nor want you
2007-10-27 12:38:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Nop its just on the verge of recruting niew members...
Poland and the rest of the new E.E. members.
2007-10-27 12:37:52 · answer #10 · answered by silent_nik 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No more that it has been in the past fifty years
2007-10-27 13:02:53 · answer #11 · answered by The Rugby Player 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋