against what you believe whereas you believe the evidence?
It seems no matter what the evidence or who the presenter, they are meat industry shills, yet you cling unwaveringly to what could be considered veger shills.
What is the criteria for an authority that both sides can agree upon?
2007-10-18
15:24:14
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Love #me#, Hate #me#
6
in
Food & Drink
➔ Vegetarian & Vegan
sandstorm---I believe we have met at the common ground on this point and moderation is definitely the best path no matter what the subject.
You gave a good answer and I appreciate your effort. It's too bad most people (on either side) can't match it. Krister gives good answers when he's not being curt.
I've really learned a lot from you folks on a subject I hardly gave a crap about a few weeks ago. You all should be proud. Really.
2007-10-18
15:45:53 ·
update #1
Also, thank you for presenting what you'd call acceptable sources.
2007-10-18
15:47:13 ·
update #2
krister---the Asians during the Chou dynasty learned to ferment the soy and they ate fermented soy. Today, most products are made with unfermented soy which hasn't had it's toxins purged.
Are you saying that the Asian world has been using unfermented soy all of this time?
2007-10-18
16:25:56 ·
update #3
krister---"I'm not trying to be a smart @ss at the moment."---that's funny..LOL
2007-10-18
16:26:38 ·
update #4
evil----you didn't answer the questions asked.
2007-10-19
05:29:01 ·
update #5
divinity-----I believe you, but I also believe that if I posted here that my doctor said I should not eat soy, people would claim my doctor was paid off by the meat industry. I've learned that most answers here are knee-jerk and conditioned.
2007-10-19
05:31:45 ·
update #6
krister----the Asians learned how to ferment soy over 1500 years ago. Do we really know how the soy affected those people before that? I don't think there's any knowledge of that at all and if there is, link it dude!
2007-10-19
05:34:18 ·
update #7