2007-10-11 13:49:23 · 16 answers · asked by curious K 3 in Environment ➔ Global Warming
First we had Sharpton, who is a vicious liar and a dangerous bigot, teaching us about what and where we can say.
Now, Al Gore
You can't be serious. Al Gore has as much credibility on environmental issues, as Bill Clinton has on marital fidelity. This is just another way of keeping himself in the spotlight a little longer...
Hypocrite Gore Should Practice What He Preaches.
After an examination of his record, it becomes clear that Vice President Al Gore talking about science and technology is like Fidel Castro or Joseph Stalin talking about freedom
and democracy - each knows little about of what he speaks. While his words may sound good and his show may be impressive, his actions are destructive.
2007-10-11 15:11:38 · answer #1 · answered by Obama Happends 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore deserves the Nobel Prize for fiction.
2007-10-12 02:58:25 · answer #2 · answered by Bill W 【ツ】 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sadly, the Nobel Peace prize has become a complete farce.
Arafat won one for terrorizing and murdering his enemies.
Carter won one for causing more strife in the middle east and making sure North Korea was well armed to destroy the rest of the world.
Gore will win one because he believes that poor people in Africa do not deserve progress and must live in abject poverty.
What they all have in common is that they are socialists and communists who do not promote peace of any kind.
Yes, I will gag when they hand the prize and $1 million over to Gore the hypocrite, but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised.
It must be very embarrassing for those who won that prize for actually achieving peace in the world, but they're probably long dead now. Didn't Mother Theresa win one for helping people? That's not why they award it anymore.
2007-10-11 15:03:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
global warming is COMPLETE BS..
Take a look at al gores documentary for example, he exaggerates his figures by 1000%, as proven by one of his former colleagues. He also fails to accurately show the warm period in medieval times of which the years were hotter on average then any other time in history. Hes telling us all to ride our bikes to work wen he flies a personal lear jet around the world and 4 out of 5 of his houses consume 20 times more energy then the normal consumer..
Theres something wrong here..
The media are all leftiess.
2007-10-12 00:59:42 · answer #4 · answered by Shane 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'd answer your question, but I'm still laughing too hard after hearing that Big Al got the Nobel.
2007-10-13 13:51:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
While global warming is a natural part of the earth. Its the hype of man induced global warming that rubs me the wrong way. But I'll repeat my statement/question again to the Al Gore groups. Why are all the planets all warming up?
2007-10-11 14:08:20 · answer #6 · answered by Tinman12 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Yea we was just going on about Nobel politics today, here's another source right off AOL. They were touted as the great brain trust of the world but I would have to disagree.
As far as algore goes, he is the perfect example of what one should not do if they are truly worried about GW, from his High maintnance lifestyle to his greed in taking advantage of the stir he hyped with bogus carbon offset trading.
2007-10-11 21:16:42 · answer #7 · answered by vladoviking 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think the awareness he is creating is great.........but doesn't it bother anyone that he is creating alot of global warming pollutants flying around on his private jet talking to people?
Also, I do not remember him being so vocal about the issue when he was vice president. Granted he was better than the Bush crew, but seriously. I believe global warmng to be real and awareness is important, but he seems at times to be slightly hypocritical.
2007-10-11 16:25:32 · answer #8 · answered by kermmit_de_frog 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Some terroists have won the nobel peace prize. Why not Al winning for his GW hype.
2007-10-11 14:20:56 · answer #9 · answered by kevin s 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Global warming is political, not scientific.
The deniers of SGW (Solar Global Warming) are just years behind modern science.
2007-10-11 14:43:36 · answer #10 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋