English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Yes indeedy.

But don't forget Paul stole it from Hellenic tales of Mithrus and Zoroastrianism and the Osirus cult. He added a dash of Judaism (sans circumcision) voila! Pauline Christianity!

Much better than those Jewish, Essene or Marician brands!

2007-10-11 11:07:52 · answer #1 · answered by QED 5 · 2 1

The entire religion was made up -

Stolen or plagerized from other works politicall motivated and so on

Tell me how John who was unable to read or write - managed to write the book o Revelations in a formal Greek?

Tell me why there are so few historians that say anything about a guy who walked on water and those that do mention him are written well after the fact or so obscure in the reference that it is meaningless ?

The 4 Gospels contridict each other no record of Jesus and so on and so on -

Was there even a Paul ?

As much as there is a character in any book I suppose but no none of them walked the earth as we were told the did and we have all fallen for it

Controlled and died for a religion that was all spin and all false


Wake up there is no quaran bible or New Testament none


Put all the religious works next to Freud and M Pet goat same s--t

2007-10-11 18:58:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Ahh, but that is just the tip of the iceberg, and the bait in the trap!
Take a good look at what Jesus and John had to say about this phenomenon in Revelations:

Rev 13:6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
Rev 13:7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
Rev 13:8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
Rev 13:9 If any man have an ear, let him hear.
Rev 13:10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.

They knew full well what was about to take place...and they PLANNED for it!

2007-10-11 18:13:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes! I am a Muslim who knows very well the high place that Allah
Subahanah Wa TaAla,has raised Prophet Isa (Jesus) to.
Paul,hijacked the Injil (Gospel) of Jesus, and fused it with Paganism,symbolic cannibalism and blood-drinking.

But it did not stop there.
The Fundamentalists of today have Hi-Jacked even the perversion made of the Gospel by Paul,to turn it into a blood thirsty hate filled semi-state religion.
When there is a conflict between the text of their Religion and the right-wing party line,It is the Religion they change.

I hate them and all they stand for,,(Just as they hate Muslims!)but this has nothing to with Blessed Prophet Jesus.

2007-10-11 22:35:56 · answer #4 · answered by InTheGreatSatan 2 · 1 1

You are right. I understand that Paul was a Jew who was persecuting the folowers of Jesus, before he claimed to see Jesus on the road. Also, he made this claim after Jesus left, and there are no witnesses to support his claim.

2007-10-11 18:15:29 · answer #5 · answered by Rebecca 3 · 2 0

Paul was a true follower of Christ, to the point that he gave his entire life and being to the spreading of Christ's gospel. He did this with the original disciples of Jesus.
The murders that were committed in the name of Christianity had nothing to do with Paul, dear.
Evil people, with their own personal gain in the balance, are the ones that began killing in the name of Christ during the first century AD.
In Paul's time, the young Christian church was persecuted, and it's followers stoned to death, and worse by the ruling religious leaders of the time. Followers of Judaism, to be exact.

2007-10-11 18:14:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I think so. Whether Jesus was real or not, I still like him. Paul was a scumbag.

2007-10-11 18:11:50 · answer #7 · answered by Citizen Justin 7 · 2 0

Yep, it is. I saw a Biblical scholar on TV saying "Christianity could easily have formed without Jesus, but never without Paul".

2007-10-11 18:06:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I think its a shame,that you have no idea of what your talking about . Maybe before you open your mouth you should read the Bible and learn something before its to late .Funny how Christ claimes to be the keystone , the coner stone the foundation and the rock all of his church.And more if you care to know

2007-10-11 18:10:30 · answer #9 · answered by the only 1 hobo 5 · 1 2

Well Jesus called Paul his chosen vessel, so apparently "Paul's religion" wasn't as big of a problem for him as it is to you.

Acts 9:15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: 16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's sake.

Paul bashing is not a new phenomena, Peter wrote about it nearly 2,000 years ago:

2 Peter 3:15 And account [that] the longsuffering of our Lord [is] salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16 As also in all [his] epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

2007-10-11 18:09:35 · answer #10 · answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers