English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Atheist are probably normal intelligent folk, who gave great thought, about God, come to a decision' that nothing exist after death, but'' you are only thinking in human terms,
,example'' a maggot thinks only in maggots condition of thought, if you get my drift' Could you' a limited human in this vast universe of creation be wrong.

2007-10-11 08:15:26 · 39 answers · asked by denis9705 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

39 answers

Of course ... "we can only think in human terms" How can it be any other way?

2007-10-11 08:20:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I see that this isn't the "But what if your wrong?" kind of question that goes with Pascal's Wager, but more of a question of "What if you're really, REALLY wrong about the nature of deity?" I remember George Lucas saying in an interview that cavemen probably understood God at a "1" level, where as we do so on a "5" level, but the scale actually goes up to a million. Of course, this would mean that theists are essentially wrong too.

The bottom line though is that there is nothing that I feel the need to deify by calling it "God". So I'm still an atheist.

2007-10-11 08:43:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yeah, I could be. So could you be wrong, thinking that there is one.

However, I challenge you to provide me with convincing evidence that he exists, because I haven't seen any. I put it to you that neither of us will know until we die - and even then, we will only know one way or the other if he really does exist. If I'm right, we will never find out.

BTW, humans can only ever think in human terms. And every religious text that was ever written was written by a human. Think about that for a moment.

2007-10-11 10:50:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

just as you could be wrong thinking there is, from the same argument that you conceive of a god that made you in his image, how like a human is that. A dog would think of a god that is in its own image, same as a maggot or a fly or any other imaginary conception.

2007-10-11 10:16:35 · answer #4 · answered by numbnuts222 7 · 1 0

I'm a Pagan and I don't think I'm wrong to believe there are multiple gods. I've had experiences with them, much as you probably feel you have with your god. Yet many christians denigrate MY beliefs as superstition and devil worship while holding up their own as sacred and holy. And again I ask, why this obsession with death and the "afterlife"? Is not this life good enough for you to get the most out of it without fearing every moment that you are going to offend your god?

2007-10-11 08:23:12 · answer #5 · answered by Cheryl E 7 · 2 0

Of course I could be wrong but that's why I consider myself an agnostic as well as an atheist. I do have no problem rejecting the major religions as being correct because they are so flawed and their history points to mere man-made stories than anything to do with a god.

2007-10-11 08:21:56 · answer #6 · answered by discombobulated 5 · 1 0

Could be, but I doubt it.

But at least I'm thinking in human terms, unlike some believers who are simply accepting what they are told.

Even the maggot is thinking for himself....

2007-10-11 11:03:07 · answer #7 · answered by davidifyouknowme 5 · 1 0

I could be wrong, but I most probably am not. The burden of proof must be with believers. Nothing I see or experience tells me there is or even could be a god in control of the whole thing.

2007-10-11 09:06:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

There are a lot of "what if's" that one could worry about in life. It comes down to fear and probability. If I am going to bother worrying about something, I'm going to worry about things that have a high likelihood of happening. I know it is hard for someone who was raised to fear god and worry about the afterlife to understand, but I don't fear or worry about these things.

2007-10-11 08:35:01 · answer #9 · answered by zero 6 · 1 0

Yes it possible that I'm wrong, but as far as I'm concern my "maggot" thinking is good enough for my purposes.

2007-10-11 09:18:57 · answer #10 · answered by jetthrustpy 4 · 1 0

Could you be wrong believing that god exists? considering the total lack of evidence outside a 2,000 year-old book which also contains a talking donkey?

2007-10-11 08:19:39 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers