I would hope it would put Marilyn Manson out of business.
2007-10-11 06:26:15 · 24 answers · asked by ? 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It just increases the fact that Manson is EVIL.
2007-10-11 07:47:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What does it could desire to do with rejecting god? It does not their are a lot of Manson followers who do no longer go out and shoot up a college we've discovered this from Columbine besides. Even Manson reported this on the subject of the tragedy at Columbine Lead singer Manson suggested on a VH1 interview that the band had cancelled 3 stay shows in memoriam of the tragedy. while asked what he might have instructed the killers, Manson suggested, "i does no longer say a difficulty. i might only hear to them... and that's what no person did" there is something that occurs to young little ones like those despite if that's being teased, picked on, or different subjects that individuals on no account get the help they go with. you won't be able to blame it on the guy who did it yet you are able to placed some blame on the mothers and dads of the baby for no longer getting them the help they mandatory and for the individuals who picked on or teased the baby.
2016-12-14 14:32:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would you hope it puts Manson out of business? He is a musician who had nothing to do with the shooting. Charles Manson used the Beatles as a reason to commit murders. Does that mean the Beatles should be punished? No. Artists create art, no matter what the message is. And if some wacko uses it as inspiration for doing bad things, it is because they are a bad person, not because of the art. This shooter would have used whatever he was into if Manson had never existed.
2007-10-11 06:36:09 · answer #3 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It won't. And how can you say that Marilyn Manson is directly responsible? Did he take the gun and shoot the people? Marilyn Manson is against such violent acts. I admit that his lyrics are sometimes more than questionable and that many have been effected emotionally by his music. But his popularity will probably go up if what you say is true because his name will get mentioned in the media more.
2007-10-11 06:31:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No it will not affect the popularity of a musician. MM did not tell this disturbed child to do what he did nor did he make the child mentally ill. MM actually has parental advisory on every CD, so blame the parent who bought the music but never got any help for their child.
I am not a fan nor do I personally agree with Mr. Manson. I do think that people need to place blame where it belongs and take responsibility for their own actions or lack of.
2007-10-11 07:02:28 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Marilyn Manson has been the target of controversy before. Remember Columbine? Those kids were also into MM.
Parents groups will hate him...his fans still love him. This isn't gonna hurt him at all...
2007-10-11 06:31:02 · answer #6 · answered by Adam G 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why would it? When the parents of Middle America get all up in arms about Marilyn Manson, his popularity soars. Hasn't anyone learned that he's a genius of marketing yet?
Edit: Did Columbine put him out of business?
2007-10-11 06:29:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Does anybody listen to Marilyn Manson anymore?
2007-10-11 06:30:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Why would you blame Manson, he was not even there.
The Christians that beat this kid up earlier in the week for not believing in god pushed him over the edge.
They are a million times more responsible than Manson for this situation.
You are blaming the reaction and ignoring the instigation.
2007-10-11 06:43:47 · answer #9 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Marilyn Manson couldn't be more culturally irrelevant were he grafted to Merv Griffin's corpse. If anything, this might make him more popular...
2007-10-11 06:31:18 · answer #10 · answered by mutterhals 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋