Yes, it is in public order situations. S 60 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
2007-10-11 06:13:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The wearing of disguises is only prohibited if a Section 60 of the crime and disorder act is placed on an area by a senior officer for alimited time.
This is only done if we think there will be real disorder in that area, and it has to be reviewed every 24 hours.
Otherwise there is no current legislation banning a person from wearing a mask disquising their features.
i may be wrong but in the days if the highwayman a local magistrate could enforce a local law stating that no persons could wear masks, but given that most people wore riding hoods and masks i would think it would be unlikely.
2007-10-11 07:56:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by the mofo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure about the answer to this one. I don't think it's an offence that warrants arrest unless you are causing suspicion. After all, take a look at carnivals, masquerades, etc. People wear masks then. Taking all into consideration, I would think that it's not an offence as such, but that anyone wearing a mask would have to remove it if required to do so by the police. And you would certainly be in trouble if you were to wear one going into a bank, shop, store, etc. Sorry, that's the best I can offer on this one. I hope you find the answer.
2007-10-11 07:19:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It either cant be or more probably there are yet again one law for the crooked and rich and one for normal people, if you remember that clown who was in charge of British Leyland Edwards was it, cavorted about with a paper bag over his head, the police, the laughably callled intelligence service and the SAS have all appeared in public wearing masks and as far as I can see none of these have ever been charged with any offence.
2007-10-11 06:31:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Stephen P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I at the instant stay interior the united kingdom and such as you i'm very shy approximately breastfeeding in public, or actually everywhere. I even have very large breast which produce a ton of milk so i will't help yet to could pump now and returned as quickly as we bypass out in public. My daughter has under no circumstances latched precise, so I pump exclusivley and locate this lots less complicated. each time we are approximately to bypass everywhere I pump suitable previously we go away understanding I even have 3-4 hours previously the subsequent pumping sesion. I do convey my kit alongside with my basically in case. I additionally convey a blanket to disguise me up. i've got had to pump interior the vehicle or perhaps in restrooms previously. i will't dodge pumping on the grounds which will basically effect in leaking by my outfits which isn't a pleasent feeling nor sight. do not trouble approximately it, you will locate the thank you to accomadate your self. Congrats on the toddler!
2016-10-22 01:04:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats a good question:- The only law i can think this comes under is being classed as "going equipped", but the police have to prove you were upto something.
wearing a balaclava and carrying a toolbag in prob not such a good idea - but balaclava's are sold for use in winter and legal to own.
Interesting.
2007-10-11 05:04:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by friskydragon 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No but if it is with the intention of causing alarm or committing a crime the answer is yes. I think This is a question about Muslim women and frankly I find the custom very offencive
2007-10-11 09:37:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Scouse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
V for Vendetta!
If there is a law against it, it probably only applies to some people?
2007-10-11 05:09:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by smith.w6079 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's fine if your an Inland Revenue collector of taxes, all they need is a mask and a gun and we could call them Dick Turpin.
2007-10-11 10:08:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by flint 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think there is a law now against wearing "hoodies" in a concealing way because criminals do it so often.
2007-10-11 07:28:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋