2007-10-11 03:59:03 · 8 answers · asked by Bravado Guru 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Someone posted, 'No big dea'l!! Do you have any problem when people refer to countries such as the US as Jodeo-Christian country?
If you do! Is that double standard?
2007-10-11 04:20:08 · update #1
Because PC is absolutely mad. It is pretty much stupid and soon enough the PC terms used these days will become PI, it's gone mad!
2007-10-11 04:04:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The question is extremely a music for the enthusiasts to respond to, rave & rant religious hatredness. contained in the first position, those who stay contained in the west could comprehend that, their own governments could not lick Muslim countries ***! What could nicely be more desirable irony, at the same time as western countries can invade muslim countries, kill civilians with the intention to get their vested pastimes finished. Has all of us the following realised, how a lot Muslims have invested in Citibank, Boeing, and so on., the record is going infinite! purely imagine,if the investement finished by using the Muslims is withdrawn from the west, what could take position. The west without the funding of middle east funding,which runs in billions of funds, could nicely be yet another africa. Dont be ungrateful and narrow minded. bypass into the data, earlier you ask even a enthusiast question. also dont ignore, how a lot the west has licked each and each and every of the countries *** internationally to acheive their objective. now to not ignore about the 1000's of thousands of natives who've died in Americas, Asia and Australia! Have a existence!
2016-10-09 00:48:44 · answer #2 · answered by parson 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
These days, there is no country which rules fully by Islam. They do not have the right to implement things specific to the times of the Caliph.
2007-10-11 04:03:46 · answer #3 · answered by rose_ovda_night 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
who says its PC? short-hand labels came about long before PC, and will liekly remain long after.
Remember First World-Second World-Third World?
How about Old World/New World?
there have been plenty of 'worlds' as defined by empires, ethnicity, or common traits.
I fail to see a big deal.
2007-10-11 04:04:10 · answer #4 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We've got the Western, Eastern, Civilised, First, Second and Third worlds, haven't we? This isn't PC, it's just idiom.
2007-10-11 04:03:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
And what other world would that be?
2007-10-11 04:02:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because it is 'them' against 'us' and we cannot have a war on our own soil. it is modern nature to catagorize the crap out of everything.
2007-10-11 04:02:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No!
2007-10-11 04:02:33 · answer #8 · answered by God is love. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋