2007-10-11 00:07:58 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
A nuclear weapon is not just a bullet that you launch against an enemy. The fallout from a nuclear explosion can have an impact around the world. You may very well end up killing millions of innocent people if you did launch a nuclear weapon. Your family may be included in this number. I don't think it is responsible to even postulate being the cause of such a catastrophe.
2007-10-11 00:26:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is madness to have a nuclear weapon, let alone use it against an adversary. All those countries possessing these hideous arsenals should heed the biblical or even commonsense advice to "beat their weapons into plough shares and nations shall know war no more..." Use of these weapons wouldn't even be in the interest of those using them, since the after effect radiation knows no bounds.
2007-10-11 00:22:20 · answer #2 · answered by Paleologus 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would only use it as a last resort. They're much better at keeping the peace than winning wars. Very few countries could afford reconstruction if a city was wiped out by a warhead. If it weren't for the nuke, the cold war could have become an active conventional war.
If a HAD to launch it somewhere, it would be Tehran, Iran.
2007-10-11 01:05:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
A sobering thought. However, for the sake and preservation of world order and for protection of its majority law abiding peoples it would be against Islams militant maniac clerics and all their kind.
Unfortunately, it's not as though they have their own fortifications wherein they could be leveled and wiped out en-mass. Therefore far too many law abiding and equally respected Muslims the world over would undeniably and unnecessarily suffer the fate those fanatics so richly deserve.
Islams radicals and their like will never, never, stop disrupting this world in their ultimate aim to dominate and rule it! Resolution of their evil intent can only come from within the Muslim world. Unfortunately, all good men in Islam are bonelessly indoctrinated and afraid to stand against any/all of Islams fanatical clerics and their institutions of terror .
2007-10-11 01:05:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I would destroy it. Utterly and completely. I would break the mechanisms into scrap and hurl the pieces into a volcano. For an individual to hold such power is madness, evil, and an affront to sanity. I'm a complete agnostic but somehow I believe the use of such a weapon is an affront to the gods.
2007-10-11 03:29:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Liberals
2007-10-11 00:11:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
It would be like my .45,out of sight and hopefully never used in anger.
2007-10-11 01:50:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Feminists
2007-10-11 03:22:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I wil not harm others. I'd rather destroy those dangerous machines. We should love others as we love ourselves. This is Jesus' teaching/moral code.
Good luck and God bless!
2007-10-11 00:17:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would just hold on to it.
The threat of using it against many is more empowering than the use of it against one.
2007-10-11 00:35:59 · answer #10 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋