English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

McCann’s - this is a message for all you would be investigators - focus on who was at the resort and who was sitting at the table the night Madeline disappeared, find pictures, speak to staff - Don't believe that all have been accounted for!

Look for a very high up city senior executive with connections to an influential MP.

I know he was at the table that night but his name has never appeared in any press articles. His MP friend has close connections with Clarence Mitchell whose initial task was not to help the McCann’s but to avoid dragging this Senior Executive into the events.

This senior executive was there to engage in a swingers party, which those at the McCann table were apart of.

Investigative Journalism should uncover the rest.

2007-10-10 22:32:39 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

For those who think this is just another go at the McCann's you are wrong. The press are very worried about dealing with this story and the facts I have listed.

The government got involved by default an MP doing a friend a favour, hence Clarence Mitchell has been detached from any link with the Government.

I have printed this because I believe once we get through the lies surrounding the events of the night , and these are lies, we will reveal the truth as to what happened to Madeline

2007-10-10 23:06:09 · update #1

This is what happens everytime 'team McCann get involved and try to deflect the message back to searching for Madeline.

Lets get everyone telling the whole truth first and go from there!

2007-10-10 23:51:51 · update #2

Faith - I am not questioning their secret life, more that they have not told the truth. How can we get to the bottom of this if they don't divulge everything?

2007-10-11 01:00:43 · update #3

29 answers

trancebabe is right. If you know something, you should speak. Otherwise, what you are saying will be considered another rumour and will die here.

Edit: Thanks Tim :-) Still hot like summer here... I thought it would be a wise decision to put on a hat for sun protection.

2007-10-10 23:04:14 · answer #1 · answered by Maria 4 · 6 0

i dont think swinging should be seen as a crime. nor indeed a reason for a cover up. the main crime here, the only one we know fr certain has taken place, is the fact that 3 children under 4 had been left alone. possibly more if we believe what was written regarding all the children in one apartment.
The idea that there is a cover up on a British government scale, is far too disturbing to think about.

The police in both countries should concentrate on brining forth all the evidence they have, search for the girl's body and try and wrap this thing up within the next 18 months.

2007-10-10 22:40:06 · answer #2 · answered by ombomstiggywoggles 3 · 9 0

in the event that they're secure species, it extremely is only because of the fact of thoughts of style and decency which come needless to say to maximum civilised human beings. whilst human beings have suffered a bad heartbreak, you do not commence sniping at them. contained in the cliched language which would be needed to talk with lots of the posters right here, you do not kick human beings whilst they're down. regrettably, there are a number of kicks right here, yet they typically pass over their aim. by no skill have I seen this way of number of sanctimonious, hysterical and a million/2-witted observations. the guy who thinks it sinister that Mrs McCann would not seem wailing and tormented earlier the media could be extreme on each physique's record of idiots. have you ever by no skill heard of dignity? Errr, i assume not. The McCanns went to Rome to get exposure for his or her lacking toddler, who, contained in the regrettably not likely adventure she is alive, is very almost actual in a rustic the place the case has not been dominating the information. via assembly the Pope they get extra photos of their daughter revealed, and that's what they maximum choose. Why shouldn't they pass away their different babies with an aunt jointly as they try this? it form of feels very sensible to me. And the courtroom circumstances approximately use of a private jet are surprisingly ridiculous. in this good judgment, it might probably have been ok in the event that they had hitchiked. They have been presented a jet, and that they took it. It have been given them from A to B extra immediately than something could have achieved. Why could they have grew to become it down and delivered a scheduled flight rather? Are there direct, on a regular basis flights from that area of Portugal? it is glaring that human beings have strongly differing perspectives approximately whether youthful babies could ever be left on my own, and, being the united kingdom, this seems immediately to have divided human beings on class grounds besides. yet particularly how this finally ends up in criticisms of those mothers and dads for vacationing to Rome to maintain up the familiar public pastime this difficulty so urgently needs to maintain if the daughter remains alive to be 'observed' is rather previous rational expertise.

2016-10-06 11:52:52 · answer #3 · answered by dutel 4 · 0 0

OK ... despite myself I am intrigued.

Would this have anything to do with Dianne Webster?

I've always found it strange that her identity was unknown until 11 August - over 3 months after Madeleine disappeared, whereas the names of the rest of the group were pretty much public knowledge from the first week.

2007-10-11 20:03:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Are you Andrew? Why don't you blow the whole thing out of the water if this is true. Post on the internet everything you know and get the whole thing out in the open. You can do it anonimously if you prefer but if you have important information it is your duty to Madeleine and the truth to lay all the cards on the table. I think there is something very sinister about this case. The McCanns have been given too much protection. Apparently they even have Special branch protection. Do the right thing and tell us what you know otherwise people are going to think you are just talking crap and are obsessed with swingers.

2007-10-10 22:56:51 · answer #5 · answered by trancebabe 4 · 13 2

You're mixing things up.
Sure, its possible the McCanns may have a secret life.
Many people do.
Hey! theres stuff about me that i wouldn't want you to know!
And am sure theres stuff about you that you don't want me to know too...
I drift...

My point is that this is IRRELEVANT.

In no way should someone's personal life be construed as a direct link to murder just 'cos that personal may not be the socially acceptable norm. If there is PROOF that there is a direct link to this secret life & the murder...well then...in Gerry McCann's own words..."bring it on!!!"...

But if theres no proof...then in my own words..."ZIP IT UP!!!"...
(uppercase again...i need a break...)

2007-10-10 23:47:24 · answer #6 · answered by Faith 6 · 2 0

I can believe that people entertain this kind of rubbish. we should all be ashamed of ourselves that we give this nonsense internet time when there are real peoples lives at stake, not to mention that poor little girl.
I people put the effort that they currently use making stuff up to post on the internet into ensuring that these things dont happen in the first place the world would be a better place.
Mind you, what would we tittle tattle about then ????

2007-10-10 23:27:55 · answer #7 · answered by joe c 3 · 1 3

Cannot believe for one second that Kate and Gerry are swingers,as you infered...........christ man,you would have to be truly desperate to go with Kate.ld rather sleep with cuddle cat.

2007-10-11 12:30:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

And with all of this information and You, that poor baby still hasn't been found. Maybe, just maybe, all that bent up energy could be better utilized in some other capacity. God Bless.

2007-10-14 22:41:50 · answer #9 · answered by Bethy4 6 · 1 1

Interesting. The fact that you only joined Yahoo Answers today, that is, not the "information" given in your "question".
Why haven't you gone to the papers with this stuff?

2007-10-10 22:37:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers