I'm an atheist like House, but I thought it was obnoxious of him to tell that dying guy that he wasn't going anywhere. (I'm talking about the one with the dog).
It's not really House's business how people comfort themselves in difficult times, and I don't think he should try to take away someone else's comfort if it didn't effect him.
2007-10-10 07:01:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Is that what you saw. Interesting how we view things as we want to see them, because I didn't see that. This is why eye witnesses in the court of law are not very reliable.
House, for being an atheist and a doctor, wanted to know what made that patient stick the knife into the electric socket. He was reluctant to speak at all. Maybe he experienced something behind his understand, or maybe to leave it to our imagination to make of it as, the audience, we want.
That is a show. House was mocking what we might see in the afterlife, and mentioned the 72 virgins that he may get. House seems to mix religions. Was he talking about Christianity or Islam. since 72 virgins are in Islam not Christianity.
I agree with Windom Earle. Who is he to tell a dying person what to expect after death. House was funny, now he becoming arrogant and rude, and the funny part is becoming less and less.
2007-10-10 11:26:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bravado Guru 5
·
9⤊
0⤋
Well first you read too much into it. the guy who died in the car accident never said he saw Jesus/god he said that there was something more out there. And House electrocuted himself and wanted to speak to that guy. no one else first. I don't think there is anything to really think about. its a T.V. show. You cant even believe everything you hear in the news how can you believe something you see on a fictional show?
2007-10-10 07:13:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lorena 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a TV show. The actors say whatever is in the script.
Personally I do not watch House. Having grown up watching Hugh Laurie making fun of this exact form of American TV drama (along with Mel Smith and/or Stephen Fry) I can not take him seriously. I suspect that he is secretly doing a massive send-up.
2007-10-10 07:09:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Simon T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
damn! I ignored it final nite. From what you wrote, I confident desire I observed it. besides, i'm Christian, and that i've got heard that earlier. on the time of Christ, adult adult males wore the equivilent of what a gown is to a girl - they might pull it up and tuck it into the belt section, with a view to work together in conflict, could desire to they be attacked. So, rather, while Scripture says to no longer placed on the clothing of a guy, and somebody desires to make something of it, then a woman could desire to placed on pants, no longer a gown. So thats stupid. As for the hair, i think of its bearing on one million Corin 11:15 - yet quite that's no longer suitable if females have long hair or no longer, - in case you back up some, in step with threat 5, verses - you will see that a woman could desire to continually have her head coated (via Chris) via Angels. on the time of Noah, the reason for the flood grow to be that Angels have been giving and taking in marriage to human females and producing little ones. God sent the flood to rid the earth of those hybrids. Scripture says that interior the top situations, that's going to be only like in those days of Noah - The Angels would be returning. the girl on the practice grow to be so a techniques off the mark, its ridiculous. No, God does not care what you place on; its in common terms suggested that its no longer suitable for a girl to gown like a whore - yet thats only reliable uncomplicated experience, now could be no longer it.
2016-12-14 13:26:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by burnham 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't yet watched that episode, but taped it for later viewing. It doesn't surprise me, however, that such statements were written into the script. TV is, after all, a vast wasteland that Secular Humanists use for propaganda.
Thanks for pointing it out and God bless you!
2007-10-10 07:09:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Devoted1 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I was kinda wondering what the heck House was talking about, as well. Did he see something or not? Good question.
2007-10-10 07:11:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kimbo Bimbo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not surprised. I knew he would say something at the end about having seen nothing.
2007-10-10 07:03:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jess H 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The near death experience is all in your mind, just like a dream.
2007-10-10 07:01:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋