Archaeologist have found proof of the existence of Jesus. They have been going over their findings with a fine tooth comb for the past 10 years. Top archaeologist world wide have picked over these findings as well. Scientist have too. Although, their findings don't show the existence of God. It does however show a strong existence of Jesus Christ. A peer review, is due to come out.
Now they are ready to reveal their findings to the public. This is big. A panal of archaeologist and scientist are holding an conference to reveal their findings. The conference is expecting to have over 1000s of noted scientist and archaeologist, you name it.
They are giving away 100 tickets to this conference to the general public. If you don't have an invite you don't get in.
How should these tickets be divided up? Atheist,agnostics, believers, or just first come first serve.
2007-10-10 06:04:16 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
in 1000 years archaeologists will prove that Hitler existed and yet they will have no idea as to what the man actually did. AKA separating fact from legend...
2007-10-10 06:17:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It will never happen, you know why? Apart from those writers--the gospel--no one else at the time wrote anything about Jesus strange that, considering we have a lot of writing from the time, and none about a man who walked on water or performed miracles apart from the religious doctrine.
You would think, as scientists do, that there would have been some other corroboration from the period especially considering his feats and following.
2007-10-10 06:27:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Have you ever heard of the Illuminati? or the New World Order? They, the secret societies that control the world PLANT evidence and PAY people to say that the stuff is old, why? So that they can still gain control of the world and by making it seem as if there is proof of such a thing, they control the churches and all of the religions that believe in the bible.
2007-10-10 06:09:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
Let me guess, yet another "tomb" has been found huh?
*rolls eyes* first the Shroud of Turin was shown to be a fraud, then the James Ossuary, then the laughable "Jesus tomb", what's next? His highschool transcripts?
You people really are gullible aren't you? P.T. Barnum had it right all along...
2007-10-10 06:11:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would have to have more information about which archaeologists, the nature of the "proof," how it was determned to be "proof," and by whom, where this information was published, how and by whom it was funded and whether it has been corroborated independently by other archaeologists.
Can you supply this data?
2007-10-10 06:13:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Reporters. They can disseminate the information more readily, then the rest of us can judge for ourselves.
2007-10-10 06:08:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What are you going to do if the proof is a coffin with his body in it?
2007-10-10 06:08:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I could make outrageous claims with no source cited too.
2007-10-10 06:18:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I'll just catch it on the Discovery channel.
2007-10-10 06:10:34 · answer #9 · answered by average person Violated 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's a good thing you cited your source; otherwise I would never have believed you.
2007-10-10 06:07:21 · answer #10 · answered by Dreamstuff Entity 6 · 8⤊ 0⤋