Are you tired of these creationists and their nonsense "proof"???

Question

the same stupid questions....

Q.if we come from monkeys then why are monkeys still around
A. humans evolved due to a particular selective pressure placed upon us (environment) monkeys didnt have that so they didnt evolve in the same way

Q. Why arent there intermediate versions of animals today?
A. they were unsuccessful and have died out or evolved even further less than 99% of animals that have even lived are alive today

Q Doesnt everything have a designer?
A. No... its called autopoieses life generates life. humans give birth to humans, dogs give birth to dogs cars do not create new cars

Answer 1

yes

Answer 2

Lets look at your answers or proof?. These answers are not a joke . They are real answers given by intelligent evolutionists. This is why mans wisdom is foolishness with God ...

Q. Why have no intermediate transitional fossils ever been found?
A . Puntuated equilibrium .....LOL

Q. How did the first life evolve from non life?.
A. Well it took billions of years, or maybe it was planted by
space travelers ...LOL

Q. Where did the matter come from that predated the Big Bang?
A . Nothing exploded and became something.. LOL

Q. Why do 2 of the planets and at least 6 moons spin backwards if the law of Conservation of Angular Momentum
applies to the big bang?
A. I dont know. LOL

Don't cling stubbornly to the lie of evolution, Come to Christ

Answer 3

Q1. It is believed that we and apes have common ancestors. Too bad all the fossils that evolutionists try so hard to brand as pre-human/ape like ancestors have been proven to be ancient apes, not ape/human.

Q2. So what if they died out? Fossils are remains of those that ARE dead. Unless you say that they evaporate into their air. This is a bad excuse.

Q3. Sorry, from nothing cannot come everything. The universe is not eternal; It had a beginning. From this beginning, life cannot exist on its own. This scientifically impossible. Your biology books tell you that the molecules existed since the formation of the earth formed a pre-biotic soup with necessary amino acids to polymerize into complex molecules which eventually all living organisms today came from. This has never been proven.

Miller experiment failed to prove it.
Abiogenesis has never been proven.

Answer 4

each and every time a creationist speaks, they communicate nonsense, so sure, that's risk-free to anticipate that your creationist chum is conversing nonsense. in fact that the finches interior the Galapagos do instruct prezygotic reproductive isolation and as a result are superb categorised as distinctive species. in spite of if we enable ourselves to be dissuaded in this factor to declare that one and all which is seen that's version interior of a species, we are able to nevertheless with ease think of a concern the place with endured isolation 2 populations might diverge to the factor the place interbreeding became impossible even under laboratory circumstances and the place the two populations began to look very distinctive from one yet another and positively like distinctive "types" of organisms. observe that none of this could ever be reported in any time scale that we would have the skill to computer screen or perhaps start to savour, yet we are able to work out the evidence that this has occurred by using anatomy, physique shape, biochemistry, embryology, and the fossil record.

Answer 5

You answered for us with your fourth question. Mine to you is- Can you explain the Cambrian explosion? Most creatures that showed up after the explosion cannot trace themselves back pre-Cambrian. If this is the case, what does it do to your hypothesis called evolution?

According to Darwin, it DESTROYS it!

You are telling me that, sometime in the past, long ago, a paramecium was separated from it's flagellum? That there was another creature similar to it, that had the flagellum and they made others like themselves? WRONG!!! Parameciums self-propagate. What you are saying is that they created the flagellum from nothing or that they picked up the flagellum from something else. Hhhmmm, that doesn't explain the "motor" attached to the flagellum.

Please answer how this took place and I might consider evolution as more than a theory.

Why can't there be an alternative theory taught in school? Why do you have to force my children to believe that the only theory to teach is evolution? Seems anti-scientific to me. They don't want another answer to be possible. They have already answered their hypothesis and are looking for ways to back up the answers they already have.

Answer 6

Okay I will answer this question once and for all. Believe it or not both are true, the 7 days in the bible are in gods time, not ours that means it was at least 7 thousand years of evolution, you have to be a fruit cake to think something can speak and then the universe lines up and does it. I do think our evolution was helped. I think you have to be plan dum to think that we just came from gue, if that was the case by now we should have mapped out the human body DNA and all, to where we can use it for our benefit. The truth is that a being (God) did come to this planet and on his arrival he killed the dinosaurs and started the cycle for our evolution. This may not be popular but the truth never is. Both are true, and we have to live with it. Our bodies alone should show you this. The animals on this planet can not be explained, sharks able to see the electric current in your body, eagles that can see great distances with there natural eyes. There is no way you can right off how amazing this planet is with out an alien presence. if we did evolve from gue, we would be dead, our planet would be dead just like every other planet in our galaxy. God made this planet so perfect and with so much thought, the core of the earth is our engine it protects us from the ruffness of space, and keeps the planet in balance. I am not a Christian, but somethings do go without saying. Think out side the box, better yet let the box be your spring board for a better overstanding of what is around you.

Answer 7

I understand the first two points, but the third isn't quite as good in my eyes. Non-life is typically created by life, and therefore would point to creation of the earth (the alternative would be that non-life created something else in a non-life form. With that being said, non-life isn't typically associated with creating life (expect in the evolutionary theory) so it would make since to have a creator/designer. Neither theory holds very well with me, but it is much easier for me to understand a higher power that created things than that everything just happened to be in the exact circumstances for life to come out of previously non-living substances.

Answer 8

No, actually I'm not tired of it. It serves a dual purpose for me:
1.) It's often highly entertaining to me here on R&S.
2.) It serves as a constant reminder how dangerously ignorant religion can be and how important it is to counter that ignorance with the voice of reason whenever possible.

Answer 9

You are absolutely correct. Creationism is an outstanding example of the greatest sin of all, which is ignorance. Unfortunately, it is a human failing upon which organised religion feeds.

Answer 10

Machines creating machines is not far fetched today. A car is simply just not equipped with the technology to created other cars, but if it was, it would.

However.... Yes it is getting bothersome with those creationists that has never even heard of the word "science"...

Answer 11

Yes, I get tired of the stupidity. We all do.
But being tired of it and explaining what should be common sense to these numbskulls doesn't seem to help.
If they want to cling to a delusion, you cannot really force them out of it.
They are motivated and convinced by emotions -not by logic or reason.
If it were up to them, the world would still be flat.