A. Do you know of any building that didn't have a builder?
___ YES ___ NO
B. Do you know of any painting that didn't have a painter?
___ YES ___ NO
C. Do you know of any car that didn't have a maker?
___ YES ___ NO
If you answered "YES" for any of the above, give details:
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Just answer the questions don't add anything. Thanks!
2007-10-10 03:41:02 · 33 answers · asked by Saved by Grace 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
A. Yes. Most of them have multiple builders.
B. Anything by Jackson Pollock. I dare not consider him an artist.
C. Now you're just being silly
2007-10-10 03:45:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, to all three, with the codicil that I be allowed to ask another question: do you know any A. building B. painting or C. car that was NOT of human make? Your implied analogy as I understand it is based on a fallacious assumption--that just because manmade items have a maker that natural items must also have a maker. It is the assumption that the natural world must operate in the same way the artificial human world does.
2007-10-10 03:50:15 · answer #2 · answered by Black Dog 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
#1. Yes.
I know abodes that are technically CARVED out.... but they still get called "buildings" in the loosest sense.
#2. Yes.
Some modern part pieces are "found art"... though more often with paint involved, it tends to be "accidental art". Funny how accidents happen and the result looks pretty... isn't it?
#3. You got me there... No.
But then "car" is rather specific by definition. You don't get "half cars" or "slightly like a car" things ... for all intents and purposes.
2007-10-10 03:46:39 · answer #3 · answered by Lucid Interrogator 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What in the world does this prove?
Show me a mountain that humans have built.
Show me an ocean that humans have built.
Show me a moon that humans have built.
Just because there are no man made objects that were not made by man (a strict contradiction if I ever heard one), does not mean that a god exists.
In fact, here is a pop quiz for you?
Did you know that there are two stories of creation in the bible and they contradict each other? That means that there is error in the bible right off the bat. So much for it being a divine piece of literature.
2007-10-10 03:45:27 · answer #4 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The only details you need honey is to realize that you only listed things that human beings have designed. Everything else in the physical world where the "designer" is unknown you contribute to God. Therefore you should realize that perhaps some things are designed and somethings have naturally happened that our brains have evolved to make sense out of in similar ways to things that are designed by an intelligent being.
2007-10-10 03:53:17 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes
yes
yes
All three can be made by robots/artificial intelligence today. It is just yet too expensive to have house being build like that, but yes I know of them.
Thing is that devolutionists(christians) doesn't look beyond the robot. The line of creation is also a form of evolution.
2007-10-10 03:49:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you want to give any one of the various Gods credit for creation then you must give the same supreme being the blame for everything that goes wrong too.
Do you know of any natural disaster not called an act of God?
___yes ___no
2007-10-10 03:48:52 · answer #7 · answered by t. B 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm assuming your argument is that we can't be without a creator. That's one of the poorest arguments I've ever heard. We are not buildings or paintings or cars. We are people.
I think I'm just a little dumber for having read this.
2007-10-10 03:45:06 · answer #8 · answered by trigam41 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
What you're trying to say is everything has a maker, and it would be stupid to think otherwise.
Well you're wrong.
The Big Bang Theory sounds MUCH MUCH more probable than a statement saying "God" just magically "created Earth"
Elements building up and different minerals creating the Earth sounds a lot easier to believe.
Fading to black instead of our dead brains dying as our souls leave our body to go to who-knows-where sounds a lot easier to believe.
2007-10-10 03:45:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
A. No
B. No
C. No
Did I win? Monty, tell me what I've won???
2007-10-10 03:43:26 · answer #10 · answered by Samurai Jack 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋