2007-10-10 03:27:01 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
sure why else are we there?
2007-10-10 04:53:21 · answer #1 · answered by sobe_it_69 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i'm a Republican, at present enlisting interior the Coast look after, and that i could be SO PROUD to bypass to Iraq and serve the rustic. regardless of no rely if or no longer defense force workers trust the conflict, they signed up and pay attention bypass with admire to do the job that their u . s . has demanded of them. So possibly I won't continually be residing house for all the birthdays and trip trips--i'm going to be doing something precious and hoping that my family members heavily isn't sitting there without me making statements which incorporate "Why can no longer somebody else bypass and serve?" What, you're asserting basically family members of Democrats are serving interior the conflict? What an ignorant fact. If one among Bush's daughters needed to combat, i might wish he'd help her as any be sure of a defense force toddler might desire to do. Making them experience responsible approximately lacking trip trips confident isn't supportive.
2016-11-07 21:26:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, no one has proven it was for oil, nor explained where that oil is right now.
Second, I have a son who has been several times, and a niece who is there right now.
Any one fighting in Iraq right now either enlisted AFTER we went to Iraq or re-upped AFTER we went into Iraq. They know what they are doing.
Third, every person serving has their own reason why they enlist..which by the way, is none of your business.
2007-10-10 03:46:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
Actually, if we wanted to invade a country just for its oil, I don't think we would have picked Iraq. Perhaps Venezuela. It's closer. And we could have come up with a few reasons to go in there too.
2007-10-10 04:50:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I am married to a Marine who wants to go over to Iraq. None of the Marines or families think that. They may not want to go but it is not because they think it is wrong, it is because it won't be a lot of fun.
2007-10-10 04:09:58 · answer #5 · answered by pgnprincess1212 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Let me guess. You're one of the morons that think our servicemen should get to chose which wars they fight in.
My son is in Ramadi at the moment. He joined to serve his country and is doing so in the finest tradition. Your political viewpoint isn't at the top of his list, I'm sure, and sure isn't on mine. We're not thrilled he's there for whatever reason but support his decision to be a part of the military at this particular time.
Now, why don't you go spread your liberal horse sh** on your garden where it'll do the most good.
2007-10-10 04:05:04 · answer #6 · answered by Chris L 3 · 8⤊ 3⤋
No, our honorable soldiers are there to free the Iraqi people and defend our freedom which the terrorist are trying to take away. Why do you think so many of them re-enlist? I'm sure it's not because they own stock in the oil companies, but because they believe in the mission they are on to free the Iraqi people.
2007-10-10 03:48:14 · answer #7 · answered by spinner 2 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Nope.
The soldiers are there to protect the freedoms of people like you to be able to ask retarded questions.
(I assume by your question that you drive a Prius or other hybrid?
Are you truly concerned or out of work, collecting unemployment insurance and killing time on Yahoo?
2007-10-10 04:32:31 · answer #8 · answered by sapper_12b4h 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
N O, They were sent there to fight a war against
Terrorism and nothing else!!
2007-10-10 04:25:08 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
If we are making soooo much on Iraqs oil, why is a barrell twice as much today as it was before we invaded?
2007-10-10 03:37:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋
The only people who think this are idiots.
2007-10-10 05:26:00 · answer #11 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋