English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have been censured for the following wind up reply.

Obviously Yahoo management are involved in banning attacks on religious hatred by not allowing my comment. Sectarianism is a cancer and must be criticised strongly at every opportunity. Not to do so is wrong.
I challenge Yahoo to state their policy on religious hate crimes publically.

I wrote:"This is just what happens if you allow uncontrolled immigration! For some years, we have allowed Irish people to come to Scotland. Many of these people are just pure Fascist filth and bring their evil sectarian habits with them. The union flag represents the good honest protestants in their fight against the evil roman catholics; the Irish flag represents the good honest roman catholics in their fight against the evil protestants. Fortunately when they die, they go straight to a special Hell with a big wall around it! Also there live Pol Pot, Hitler, Stalin and all the other fascists . It really is Hell! Almost as bad as Glasgow!"

2007-10-05 19:13:10 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Anti-protestant? Moi?
Is the Pope a Catholic?

Read what I wrote. I've had a few complaints from Catholics too!

It just goes to show the deep felt hatred that these people hold for no good reasons.

To qoute from 'South Pacific' "It has to be taught; carefully taught".

Anyone who stands up against religious hate crimes is a fool or wants to receive death threats. You would be amazed at the response from the bigots.
I feel like I'm a holocaust denial freak!

2007-10-05 19:26:05 · update #1

OK I ADMIT IT, IT'S A WIND UP and I promise to be serious from now on.

My last comment is that it is strange that when most people say that religion is dead, religious predudice is alive and well!

2007-10-05 19:58:47 · update #2

12 answers

Ha-ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Almost as bad as Glasgow...


...But not quite...

2007-10-05 19:15:52 · answer #1 · answered by CanadianFundamentalist 6 · 5 0

good component, yet God has continually had a representive right here in the worldwide, the Isralites and then later while they rejected the Christ, the 1st centry christians. you may remember nevertheless that devil policies this worldwide and is not purely an enemy of God yet of mankind and doesnt prefer them to comprehend of his grand purposes for the earth and righteous mankind. So of direction he makes it confusing for those quite searching for the main suitable faith, how does he do this such as you stated he has formed many faiths. they'd look diverse yet once you commence staring at them you are able to can see that maximum of them do not line as much as what God needs of his people e.g. how lots of those relgions will circulate to conflict and kill their fellow guy while Christ stated that they could love thy neighbour? additionally they stick to many artifical doctines which at the instant are not got here across interior the Bible or additionally will discredit the Bible, not utilising it for guidience, and place self assurance in human know-how. So somewhat in a nut shell, fake faith promotes conflict, and a loss of love. yet a Jesus stated you will realize his followers via the affection they have between themselves. All countries would be united in that love. each and all of the superb.

2016-10-06 04:43:37 · answer #2 · answered by herbin 4 · 0 0

Wow. You are opinionated and mean. I guess Yahoo would like this to be a civil place, for conversation without the insults. Clearly, you are troubled and filled with negativity. Try expressing yourself intelligently, without emotional slurs. You will get a better response. Good luck.

2007-10-05 19:19:46 · answer #3 · answered by Jude F 2 · 3 0

If I were you I would not anger the gods of Yahoo.

If you read the Community Guidelines you agreed to abide by any decision of Yahoo. In fact, you could get into trouble again for reposting your question.

No offense. I just want to help.

2007-10-05 19:24:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

If you were to say "That violates my right to prejudice" you will be invited to have the door hit you where the good lord split you. However if you were to say "That violates my right to practice my religion" well, thats a different question, it allows to you to get away with almost anything, with the backing of the courts.

2007-10-05 19:23:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Many people today tend to see anyone who disagrees with them as 'aggressive'. If they use strong terms then they are 'full of hate'. Grow up mates otherwise you're going to have a very hard life.

2007-10-05 19:26:10 · answer #6 · answered by cheir 7 · 1 1

Evil be to he who should evil think ( I have lost my Garter and my Latin phrase book and probably misquoted King edward II who ever he was)

2007-10-05 20:41:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You sound like you're JOINING them too. FREEDOM OF SPEECH long as it's within the guidelines, thout you knew.

2007-10-05 19:17:57 · answer #8 · answered by hamoh10 5 · 3 0

Lain was a kick *** anime.
Anyway, you and your catholic enemies are both wrong, and neither of you are going to hell.

2007-10-05 19:18:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

You're reposted your anti-Protestant screed inciting hatred and violence, and wonder why a privately held business doesn't want your kind associated with their advertising?

My goodness, you're a damn tard.

2007-10-05 19:16:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

fedest.com, questions and answers