When did you first learn that creationists believe cavemen lived with dinosaurs and what did you think?

Question

I honestly just learned about it a few weeks ago. I find it to be hilarious but also deeply disturbing.

Answer 1

I saw it in a homeschooling "text book" two years ago and about wet myself laughing.
I'm betting the kids that study that are not getting a scholarship to Harvard.

Answer 2

truthfully, they did. i don't have faith that something would desire to final one million years, not to point out, sixty 5 million years. it would harm down chemically, long formerly that. Carbon dating is notoriously unreliable, partiularly for issues older than approximately 2000 BC. i think of the hunt we ought to continually settle on is: why is carbon 14 dating the gadget it fairly is utilized by skill of evolutionists? There are some dozen structures for dating. maximum of them tend to furnish lots till now dates. i contemplate whether that would desire to be the clarification. Evolutionists say that evolution is so sluggish that it takes hundreds of thousands of years, so we use a gadget that provide (lots of the time) very previous a while. Is that around reasoning? Very long sessions are required, and it incredibly is the reason carbon 14 is used. I even have heard that there are dinosaur prints someplace out west with human foot prints superimposed on them. that fairly does not marvel me. yet another attention is each and every of the particularly some cultures that have a mythological creature that we call a dragon. Now, dinosaurs are a reasonably recent discovery, yet dragons bypass decrease back hundreds of years. In Genesis, there is connection with a creature talked approximately as behemouth. The discription does not sound like all animal residing on the instant, yet it does sound like an define of a dinosaur. So, i've got faith if we seem on the info, dinosaurs would seem contemporaneous with early people. the only reason that one would think of otherwise is using carbon 14 dating, and that i've got already given my opinion on that.

Answer 3

This isn't going to sound at all informed but look at the question, honestly... and your answers too.

First crrationists are really not the only ones who have thought this before now. Its just that given all the new texts and teachings that they have decided to speak up. The removal of God from life. Not Science. Science has become just as political as school and government now. But to say that God has no place in the understanding of life is innapropriate. So creationist defend this point because it is writen that man and a certain kind of classification of animal (of the behemoth nature and notr being singular) was pressent with man all throughout his history. The animals are described with undeniable description in the erliest books of the Bible and are believed to be none other than dinosaurs because the of the unique words used. They don't describe buffalo or elephant or whale or reptile (though similar in very few respects but specified as entirely other). I don't believe that we truly know anything about our ancestors at this point. Even with fossil records and small human bones. When will we fid the ancestors the Bible tells us of? We wont, you know why? God made things the way that they are for a reason. Faith.
As far as human history we are continual finding ancient things. Most of which we must assume is post-flood. But still there is more to find. Again this will not be perfectly accurate because I don't think you look into sourcing much with a question like that. I once saw video of an archiological dig done in Greece and the findings there pre-dated the ancient greeks. Boat travelrs that made a short lived settlement. And it wasn't just a decade previous it was hundreds of years. These were post flood people. Just like the travelers who hunted animals into the americas and the ones who migrated south into africa and west into europe. We have dated things continually further back since we discovered carbon dating and all the other kinds of radio-active timelines.

I have a serious problem with this whole radioactivity dating method I don't believe for a second that we should be relying on it for scientific proof. It is being missunderstood and the premise is flawed in my oppinion. Yes half life seems to work the way we think it does but we have not considdered all the variable, I believe.

It is becoming more of a race for change than a search for truth.

I have seen documentation of actual dinosaur footprints in a fossilized riverbed with a human foot print inside of it. As it was being uncovered there were two news crews at the site and one of them left the site for "undisclosed" reasons at the time of excavation. Sure people have lied and I don't believe everything I am told so this kind of stuff does not appear sollid to me. True or not.

There are much bigger issues here than you are able to comprehend or would be mature enough to respect. There is a much more narrow fight for controll that you don't see here. If you do have an idea for what I am talking abou then go ahead contact me. Otherwise I think this question is very basic and unnecessary unless you know the complete story.

Much too much to type on one space. Just know this. You may think you know, you don't. But deep down the answer was always there.

Answer 4

Probably when I learned about dinosaurs (as a child). I figured cohabitation of all species is implicit in creationist orthodoxy. I had to learn that we did not live with the dinosaurs. I don't think that's something that's so obvious as to be known beforehand.

Answer 5

Don't be disturbed..
I know people alive today that lived in caves when they were younger. Does that make them cavemen?
But there weren't any dinos around then.
But yes cavemen, (so you call the people) were alive when dinos were here. People probably ate them..
Remember Jurassic Park is a fiction movie.
Or maybe if everyone decides to believe the movie it will become truth and be taught in schools.

Answer 6

Has anyone ever heard of a pre-adamic kingdom? In Genesis 1:1, the Bible says that God created the heaven and the earth. In verse 2 the earth was void and without form. What happened to the earth? You know He didn't create it that way, right? When God said, "Let there be light" it was an act of restoration. God told Adam in Gen 1:28 to "REplenish" the earth.

Answer 7

When I was a child (11 years old) because I went to a Christian school. I believed it then, but now I realize it was complete BS. It's totally preposterous to believe dinosaurs and humans lived together.

Answer 8

i don't remember, but it must have been ages ago. i can't reproduce my exact thoughts here, but it was something like "wow, that's ****ing stupid". but i was a kid, i wasn't taking into account the fact that these people earnestly believe that the earth is a few thousand years old. after decades of educated people berating them about dinosaurs, they were bound to come up with some sort of answer, no matter how lame it appears to us.

Answer 9

It wasn't CAVEMEN that lived with dinosaurs... it was the BIBLE folks. These morons think that the Flintstones was some kind of documentary, fer crissake.

Take a look at this...

Answer 10

I used to think cave men lived with dinosaurs. have you ever seen The Flintstones?