people only confirms that HE is the TRUE one and only GOD, Creator of the Heavens and the earth? You all never seem to attack Allah or Buddha. Why is that?
Please keep the ranting to a minimum.
2007-10-05 08:58:47 · 45 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Are you Muslim or Buddhist? Well, then. We'll just have to respond to what's posted. When some Muslim or Buddhist posts a question, we'll respond to them, too.
Until then, we'll just mock your pet superstition. The TRUE one and only GOD?! LMAO! That's what they all say.
2007-10-05 09:01:22 · answer #1 · answered by nondescript 7 · 13⤊ 6⤋
From a Christian; What if I told you (and can give scriptural evidence to support the assertion) that the Bible and scriptures are not the same currently in this country for most people. I.E., the Bible violates 2 Tim.3:16-17, 2 Tim. 2:15, and the '2 ormore witnesses' principle (Matt. 18:16, 2 Cor.13:1). Is that worth the 10 points to you presently?
2007-10-05 09:39:15 · answer #2 · answered by jefferyspringer57@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A proper atheist would never need deny the godhood of Buddha, because he'd have the education to know Buddha never claimed any...
Now as for God vs. Allah, I'm pretty sure it has to do with the fact that on an US based English language forum, you can expect 90% of religious fundamentalists to be Christians.
Well, that, and they might have the education to know "Allah" is Arabic. Means "God". Same thing, really.
2007-10-05 09:07:16 · answer #3 · answered by The Arkady 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Please read every answer to every question I have ever given in R&S. I don't attack God, Jesus or the Bible though I am an atheist. I may not agree with your beliefs, but I don't attack them. I don't attack Buddha or Allah or Zeus or any other diety that anyone chooses to believe in.
2007-10-05 09:09:28 · answer #4 · answered by Allison P 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't "attack" anyone. I merely state my disbelief in this god you speak of, or any others for that matter. And just so you know, Buddha isn't looked at as a god, just a guy. The "logic" you've used here is really very poor.
2007-10-05 09:46:46 · answer #5 · answered by Two quarters & a heart down 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol well the only thing that i liked about what u said was try to keep the ranting to a minimum well for one u don't write something like u did and say that and another u r being stereotypical cuz i don't attack god and etc. i just don't believe in it it is just that most of athiest don't like christianity so they bash it
it is what is most popular so most don't like it
and islam and buddhism is interesting and we don't know it like christianity
alot of people think that christians are hippocrits but w/e dont' want to be biased bout anything and neither should u
DONT EVER SINGLE OUT A GROUP U DON' T KNOW THEM
and i sure the hell know that u don't know me
at least say most or some or something not ALL ATHEST
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr just a big f***ing grrrrrrrrrr
2007-10-05 09:08:37 · answer #6 · answered by vfadict 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well........
They do not condemn those who believe differently.
They don't go around trying to convert and knock on doors to get them to come to their place of worship.
They have more tolerance of religion than any Christian.
They don't use "Hell" as a motivator to convert.
And they don't rant or make assumptions about others beliefs.
In other words, they are more Christian like than most Christians.
This is just my personal observance over the past 30yrs and I keep thinking that maybe they will learn something, but sadly, many have become "fanatic" about their beliefs and teachings rather than accept those around them in peace.
2007-10-05 09:08:50 · answer #7 · answered by Karma of the Poodle 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sorry, yet it fairly isn't what I interpret the Bible as announcing! I hear the observe of God announcing that a "lady is to no longer carry forth in a CHURCH or SYNOGOGUE yet purely think of of the commonsesical element of what you're announcing? a woman's infants could nicely be lady and male, awesome? And we see God on a number of events telling lady to care and nurture their infants and practice them approximately God and salvation, awesome? So why in the international might that stick to to in straightforward terms females and not adult adult males, yet we instinctively understand that the lady may be in her homestead in her very own place and training the two lady and male infants, might that no longer stick to to male purely via fact they're adults? Makes no logical experience, and all of us understand God is of "information and basic experience, and information."
2016-10-10 09:08:55 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Allah is the same thing.
Buddha was a man who became enlightened.
If constant attack is a form of confirmation, would you say a boxer with a crappy win/loss ratio was the one true boxer and the inventor of the sport?
Seriously, enjoy your faith... but attempt to show a little restraint when you aren't armed with enough education of your religion of choice to make a cohesive argument.
2007-10-05 09:08:31 · answer #9 · answered by Erad 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Allah is also non-existant. Buddha was never considered a god, and there's plenty of historical evidence that he was real...deluded, but real.
Happy now?
2007-10-05 09:11:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably because there are very few Muslims and Buddhist compared to the Christian population where most of us live.
Wait!!! You confirmed the Islam religion, because most Christians in the US attack their beliefs.. Go figure!
2007-10-05 09:05:05 · answer #11 · answered by Green 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋