Right after I've finished explaining Darwins Big Bang Theory and Steven Hawkings Theory of Evolution
2007-10-05 05:08:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by darwinsfriend AM 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
To Kent Hovind, nonsense is relevant.
2007-10-05 12:15:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe he has written- er, at least I thought he could at least write...um...oh, here, I see he must be better at performance arts. He has some DVDs which I'm sure detail his, uh, well, I guess they'd have to be called conjectures.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw/002-4803838-4708019?initialSearch=1&url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=kent+hovind&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Go
Note the Ray Comfort book that's next on the list.
2007-10-05 12:10:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think it is:
If he is in jail, then his relatives will try to block all the videos about him on YouTube.
Or something like that.
Anyone know how is the Rational Response is doing suing Hovind for false copyright claim?
2007-10-05 12:32:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Simon T 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well done.
i would have jumped on this bandwagon, but i couldn't think of any good analogies...
How did steve jobbs come up with microsoft windows..was the best i could come up with
2007-10-05 12:08:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
He believes intelligence is relative, which is to say, he gets to decide who is intelligent and who isn't.
2007-10-05 12:08:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I think it has something to do with procreating with one's relatives...
2007-10-05 12:17:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋