First have a look at this question that was posted not so long before this question, then answer the question below>
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ap2ijQKE5bA3Vp1KyF8zAQ3sy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071005062108AAXTIbK
Yes I am the accomplice, and yes, I know it wasn't nice but please, PLEASE remain calm and assertive. (Those who want a second lick feel free to)
Although originally the task was to see which group used the most reasoning, we feel that we didn't achieve anything because people probably felt it was easier to type short slanders then explaining their beliefs in long answers and also with supporting evidence, and speaking of slanders, well, this is YA, not a science conference, so we really couldn't expect anything more :D
2007-10-05
04:43:09
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Ravenous Q
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
So the question is-
Both groups claim to have reasons behind their beliefs,
yet there is no definitive answer. Should people really jump into conclusion about God, even though there is not enough viable evidence for both against, and for the existence of God, if so give reason?
Belief is not a process of rational thought
(even for religion)
2007-10-05
04:43:21 ·
update #1
To Demetri (and others who feel the same way)-
Definition of Atheism: Someone who denies the existence of god - Key word DENIES!!
2007-10-05
21:30:00 ·
update #2