English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How are they doing? Are they healthier or weaker compared to other children who'd been vaccinated?

2007-10-05 04:00:23 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting Parenting

14 answers

I know I will get tons of thumbs down over this, but I have never had it done. I am totally against it for a number of reasons. I refuse to inject those poisons in my children. Do you know they use formaldehyde in certain vaccines? That is what they inject into dead people to preserve them and they want to put that in my babies? No way. That is just one of the poisons. I believe in the human body being able to take care of illness. God gave us a wonderful immune system and it is a miracle worker.
People are led to believe that if their child is vaccinated they are totally protected, that is not the case. Because the child is not truly exposed to the illness, the injection goes into the muscle rather than going through mucous membranes like a true illness, there is no true immunity. That is why children have to be re-vaccinated later in life, and why so many vaccinated children come down with illnesses they supposedly were protected against.
I believe that vaccines are dangerous. The government even has a program to compensate parents whose children have been injured by vaccines. I would rather have a healthy child than a brain damaged one, no amount of money from the government would make up for that happening.
As for being healthy? My kids never get sick, yes, that is right, NEVER. Knock on wood. I have an almost 8 year old and a 12 month old. They go to the doctor for checkups and the 7 year old had a broken arm. I have never had to take them to the doctor for an illness (cold,flu,ear infection,strept throat) in their lives.
I must mention that I do take other measures to ensure their health. I breastfed my son the first year and am still breastfeeding my 12 month old daughter. I think that is the most important start in life. Also, my kids eat whole food, fresh organic fruits and veggies and hormone free meat. Friday night is McDonalds time, but the rest of the week they eat good food. I honestly believe my children are so healthy because they only have pure things going in their body, not poisoning vaccines.
I truly recommend that you find websites or blogs written by mothers whose children are forever damaged by vaccines. They will break your heart. Make sure you inform yourself and then make your decision whether to vaccinate your children.

2007-10-05 04:42:17 · answer #1 · answered by howdesdoit 3 · 9 2

I believe it's the best thing for your baby to be vaccinated, but the shots can be spaced out. I never let them give my little ones more than 2 shots at a time. The MMR is given all by itself and I have asked which ones the doc thinks are absolutely necessary and which ones maybe not (ie, I don't get the Prevnar). Alternative vaccination schedules are becoming more popular. And I have noticed that the side effects from the vaccines are minimal now (compared to my 1st child who had the regular schedule with 4 at a time).

2016-05-21 08:32:41 · answer #2 · answered by tasha 3 · 0 0

The risk of vaccination far outweighs any risk of not vaccinating. The majority of people will not believe the number of toxic chemicals that go into a vaccine, and some will deny it. For a baby, breast milk provides all the antibody immunity they'll ever need. The rates of diseases going down are not due to vaccination, and there have been no outbreaks to call for a 260% increase in vaccination than was nearly 20 years ago. The Big Pharm and their conglomerate CDC and medical association pals keeps making money by keep inducing the fear and paranoia. I've never had a flu vaccine in my life, and guess what? You don't see me dying from the flu. I've never HAD the flu in my entire life. I've even sat next to a person who I know has the flu for nearly a week without getting it.

Less than 1/3 of all injuries, side effects, and deaths from vaccines are ever reported in this country. The government shields the Big Pharm from any liability with their compensation fund that was promoted through Congress BY the Pharm. They say "all the lawsuits will drive them out of business". Well, if they make such a harmful thing that is known to cause injury and death, why is everyone still lacking the common sense and defending the industry? Because everyone and the majority of the American public are brainwashed by an armada of their ads and flunkies that vaccines are a good thing to promote healthiness? Tell that to the thousands and millions of parents with children suffering, sick, or have died from vaccination but lack the courage to speak up because they will be shouted down by the masses, ridiculed by the corrupted medical system, and face further intimidation.

Vaccines are one of the most toxic concoctions you can put into your body or your children. Vaccines contain:

Ethylmercury Thimerosal-Only after a long battle by parents was it removed at last. It doesn't matter if it causes any harm, mercury does not belong in the body in any form and can do no bit of good but harm. Because the CDC keeps telling people so, they expect everyone to believe? The CDC is the proxy for the Big Pharm, and their "study" is like asking a criminal whether he did the crime. Of course he's going to say no. Autistic children have an excess of mercury in their bodies.

Formaldehyde-A preservative and a toxic industrial chemical.

Aluminum Adjuvants-A neurotoxin. Autistic kids have too much aluminum in their bodies.

Heavy metals-Such as lead which can cause irritability, hyperactivity(could this be a link to ADHD), or lethargy. Also a poisonous compound.

Animal Cells-Where they cultivate the viruses. You don't even want to know, that some of the cultivation even takes place in human waste and under the foreskin.

Carcinogenic, Mutagenic, Gene-altering synthetic compounds. And so much more toxic synthetic or industrial compounds that have undergone little to no testing. Even the Pharm puts a warning on all its package insert, but it's not to the people's benefit. Exemption is not for your benefit either, but only a cog in the industry's immunity from lawsuit. No one will tell you that.

All the bacteria and viruses injected into small children can be more than enough to overload their bodies' tolerance. Not that vaccination provides any permanent benefit but bypassing natural immunity-which is dangerous if a super virus sweeps across the planet.

Common sense, simple logic, and cause-and-effect all tell me that vaccines are one of the most dangerous inventions ever made. But most people are blinded by self-deceit. Or pressured or intimidated. The mandatory use of any vaccine, forcing such a poisonous concoction to be injected into those most vulnerable and lacking any voice is virtual medicinal slavery. Of course, everyone is brought up taught vaccine=good and nothing else. Look at all the children who put up whatever fight they have when they're taken to the doctor's office, then as they grow up-they did like their parents did. Take the kids in for the shots, without so much as thinking or considering what actually goes in them and what's the ulterior motive behind it. The Big Pharm has been poisoning generation after generation....

2007-10-05 07:27:55 · answer #3 · answered by jm7 5 · 4 1

Your kids wouldn't show any difference... there would just be a lowered risk of autism.
Yes, they are proving that the MMR shot leads to autism in children who were genetically prone to getting it.

I don't vaccinate for stupid things like chicken pox. I will if they dont' get it before puberty... but otherwise, there is nothing wrong with have some itchy spots.

I will never vaccinate against cervical cancer or HPV (I think I will teach my daughter the importance of protection against STDS and make sure she sees a gyno every single year after 18) whatever that stupid shot claims to do.

People! Please beware of brand new, we have no idea what happens when your children try to reproduce vaccines for things that your kids won't die from.

2007-10-05 08:37:26 · answer #4 · answered by Katie C 6 · 1 1

You're not going to be able tell anything useful from the answers you get to this question. Kids who haven't been vaccinated are just as likely to get (or avoid) all kinds of illnesses unrelated to the vaccine as kids who have. Some kids with vaccines get lots of colds, some don't. Some kids without vaccines do, some don't. Vaccines have nothing to do with colds, or flu, or asthma, or most other childhood ailments. Whether someone's kid is "healthy" or "weak" could result from all kinds of factors from what foods they eat to what exercise they get, but it doesn't result from whether or not they've been vaccinated.

Vaccines simply build up immunity in your body to germs that can cause various diseases, making it much less likely that you'll ever catch those particular diseases. In a very small percentage of people, they may cause a serious allergic reaction (but then again, so can milk, or latex, or penicillin). Vaccines drastically lower your chances of contracting serious and even fatal illness if you're ever exposed to someone who has the particular disease for which the vaccine was designed. The reason they may appear superfluous now is simply that they've been so effective; diseases that were once rampant and major public health problems are now almost unheard of due to the success of wide-spread vaccinations.

2007-10-05 06:18:25 · answer #5 · answered by ... 6 · 1 3

I wish I had not. One of my children was sick for about a month (sleeping, not eating), and couldn't hold her head up after getting certain shots. It was awful, but the doctor made me feel I had no choice. I wish I could go back and just say no.
Thankfully, she doesn't have permanent negative effects from vaccines. I would never have been able to forgive myself.
If I had another child I would not do it.

I know of 1 child who didn't have any shots and very healthy. He gets colds like any other kid, but no real problems.

2007-10-05 04:13:34 · answer #6 · answered by plastic 7 · 3 0

My first is vaccinated up to 2 years, my second is completely vaccine free. They both have rarely ever been sick, are healthy as can be. I don't see much of a difference, but they are still young. I feel comfortable knowing their immune system is un-tampered with and will be as healthy as possible in order to fight off any sicknesses.

2007-10-05 05:20:10 · answer #7 · answered by iamhis0 6 · 2 1

I vaxed my first, and he was the sickest one I had..I was going to wait with my second one till he was 1, then start, but he had other medical conditions that caused me to not do them at all..I did not want to put more into his little body, as he had to have surgery at 4 months..All of my kids have had chicken pox already and it was not that bad at all! So, to answer your question, my other kids were much healthier than my first.

2007-10-05 04:16:45 · answer #8 · answered by Momto8gr8 6 · 3 0

My children (i have a 7 year old and an 8 month old) have never been vaccinated. Neither of them have ever been sick- nor have they ever had an ear infection.

2007-10-05 04:13:11 · answer #9 · answered by Amy Clark 5 · 4 1

My friend did that with her kids. She waited until they were 3 and 5 years old to start. Just before pre school. It was hard on the kids having to get all those shots in a short period of time. Both my kids have always been up to date on all their shots!

2007-10-05 04:24:51 · answer #10 · answered by honeybear 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers