When dinosaurs and Man lived together was there conflict?

Answer 1

Probably. But there was one big barbecue.

Answer 2

It depends on whose report you want to believe. The book of Genesis tells us that after God created man, He brought by every living creature on the Earth to see what man would call them (Gen 2:19). Surely that had to include Dinosaurs as well. Additionally, in the book of Job, there is a reference to the great Leviathan of the deep, which many believe could be a reference to one of the enormous sea creatures believed to be a dinosaur of the sea(Job 41:1). Unfortunately, some meanings and definitions get lost in translation and because of sheer human nature, based upon experience; some translated words will have a different meaning as biased by the translator.
Scientific journals and study will lead you in a different path and tell you that man and dinosaurs did not exist on the Earth at the same time. Since, I was not there at the beginning of time (and neither were they) I could not tell you if that is fact or a belief.
The issue I have is that Science tends to forget that the early scientist actually used their studies to better understand God's creation as opposed to trying to disprove His existence as we see today. Everything in science is based upon theories that have stood the test of time because no-one has completely disproved them. Primary example is evolution. At its start, it was and is a theory that seems to make sense. Up until recently it has held some logic, but the problem is that there are more and more discoveries that blow holes in the original premise. However, instead of dismissing the premise and acknowledging what the Bible tells us, they try to make allowances for the error by saying there must be another point in the evolutionary chain that we have not discovered yet.
Recently, the evolutionary chain of homo-habilus to homo-erectus was destroyed when one of Dr. Leakey's relatives found the remains of both species within miles of each other at the same strata level in two separate sites in Africa. What that means is that instead of -erectus following -habilus as previously theorized, they were essentially, cohabitants and most likely crossed paths at some point. The same lack of logic can be argued in terms of homosexuality as well (I know it's of the dinosaur topic but it's related because of the evolution theory just watch). Since the Homosexual community is arguing that there's is a natural way of being and that they were born that way, the theory of evolution should support this by enabling them to reproduce within their own community.
One thing that almost supports evolution is that man has gotten larger/taller through the years. During the revolutionary War period the average height was about 5' 5." The current average height is about 5' 10". However, the Bible gives us rationale for this as well. When the Israelites moved from Egypt to the Promised Land, the spies brought back reports of how big the people were and how abundant the food was (Num 13:22-33). Move the theory to today, people of most industrialized nation or, better yet, where food source is plenteous for the population, people are typically bigger than less developed nations. Bottom line is where there is an abundance of food; the people are generally healthier and bigger. So is that evolution or better food selection?
Proof of deception: the basic evolution theory (I still say premise) is that over time a species will adapt to change to meet the requirements induced by its environment. Scientist have found certain frogs that can be asexual to reproduce when the time come, they have found earth worms are asexual as well. Surely by now, everyone knows that for whatever reason the male sea horse carries the babies until birth. However, man has been on the planet long enough as well homosexual behavior/traits if you want to call it that so why haven't homosexual humans morphed into a new species? You'll find this not to be true, because at the end of the day homosexuality is a choice/preference not something you’re born with. Homosexuals can no more reproduce with each other without some sort of human intervention, than pigs can fly without an airplane.
But getting back to the topic, and using evolutionist theory retort against them, is it so much that man did not exist at the same time, or have we just not found the evidence of it yet?

Answer 3

Dinosaurs disappeared from the earth millions of years before man showed up.

Answer 4

Dinosaurs and men lived 65 million years apart.

Answer 5

The Chinese used dinosaur bones as medicine. The dinosaurs became extinct million years ago. Humans saw only their bones.

Answer 6

Dinosaurs and man did not live together, despite all the evidence provided by "The Flintstones."

Answer 7

When Dinosaurs roam this earth there was not men as we know men, Men with a soul & A son of God, Yes there was cavemen/women back then, but they were not men as we knew men today, They were the highest form in the animal kingdom, But those cavemen/women were not a son or daughter of God & neither did they have a soul.

Answer 8

dinosaurs never lived in the same time period. dinosaurs lived w/ other large reptiles and huge insects. ater the meteor hit(or w/e else could have possibly killed them) then came small mammels, then evolution occured bringing monkey to man who lived w/ larger mammels. not dinosaurs.

Answer 9

I'm sorry, but there is no scientific evidence that man and dinosaurs co-existed.

If you want scientific truth, go to a science book. If you want spiritual truth, go to the Bible.

Answer 10

Yes the dinosaurs where smarter on R&S so man kill them all.

Answer 11

you're not serious, right? dude, just watch the flintstones, they got along fine together... even worked with one another on the job and in the home. do your research man.