Still a fruit; no seeds due to genetic modification.
2007-09-30 08:29:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, that does not exclude these. The Cavendish bananas sold commercially have undeveloped seeds, as do the so-called seedless watermelons. Those are the small dark specks near the center of the banana. There are very few bananas in the wild, unfortunately, which is leading to a rapid loss of genetic diversity. Many species of them have gone extinct in the last few decades.
2007-09-30 08:40:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is NOT the correct definition to start with. A fruit is a ripened ovary, period. Seeds come from ovules within the ovary. Whether a fruit has seeds or not does not change the fact that it is a fruit. Please be aware there is a lot of misinformation out there on the internet.
2007-09-30 08:31:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
That is an excellent question.
They would be considered a "cultivar" of the parent variety and identified as such. So you might have a "Big Yellow" banana, cultivar an the cultivar would have something "different" ... in your example no seeds. It would remain a banana cultivar.
It is good to be curious and ask these questions.
BTW "Sandstorms_brother" has no clue what the hell he's talking about.
2007-09-30 14:40:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fruits.
2007-09-30 08:30:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Love #me#, Hate #me# 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
the transformations between vegetables and culmination at the instant are not properly defined. culmination, despite the fact that, are oftentimes seen to be an suitable for eating component to a plant that contains seeds, whilst vegetables could incorporate stems, roots, tubers, leaves, and different plant aspects. yet, uncomplicated utilization of the words is greater oftentimes based on the conventional use of the article in question. case in point, tomatoes, eggplants, cucumbers, and squashes all incorporate seeds, so ought to be seen culmination, yet because of the fact that they do no longer tend to be candy and are oftentimes eaten in salads or as a element dish like vegetables, they're oftentimes stated as such. in reality, in accordance to a call made with the aid of usa of america perfect courtroom close to the tip of the nineteenth century, the tomato is legally a vegetable. the call, which compelled a tomato importer to pay taxes on flowers he claimed exempt because of the fact they have been technically culmination, grew to become into based on the reality that the juicy products have been generally served with the main component to the meal at dinner, with the soup, or as component to a course served after the soup. immediately, many tomatoes are eaten on my own and uncooked or served in juice-form, comparable to different culmination, however the debatable foodstuff maintains to be, in a criminal sense, a vegetable.
2016-11-06 20:55:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A "seedless fruit"
2007-09-30 08:43:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ummm
2007-09-30 08:39:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Go ask your mother.
2007-09-30 09:51:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by majnun99 7
·
0⤊
1⤋