vegans don't eat animal products, and become aggressive from lack of nutrients. They put animals before humans. Its disturbing.
But they still eat plants, technically, aren't plants alive? their just as innocent. Anything u can grow is alive.
savages aren't they? how could anyone slaughter an apple just b/c it bleeds with juice and not blood.
2007-09-29 11:21:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by cheesewhizgal 1
·
0⤊
5⤋
Interesting question. I am a vegan because of the reasons you listed above; therefore, I believe I would eat meat if the animals lived and died naturally. Personally, I would be rather grossed out since you would be consuming something that once ate, slept, etc. just like you or me. However, logically I see no reason not to eat the meat since you are in no way harming the animal.
2007-09-29 12:59:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by greeniepuffin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would also never eat an animal...even if it was naturally killed.
I dont eat animals because we could survive without eating them and I am horrified by the conditions.
I still wouldn't eat it even if it was natural because I think that meat is disgusting and just imagining a farmer (or whatever) getting a dead cow off the grass to serve for food is too horrifying to think about.
2007-09-29 15:47:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brianna :) 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a compassionate vegetarian. Even if released and eaten only if they died I still would not eat animals as I find the act of eating flesh abhorrent. I have been a vegetarian for so many years that I'd probably get very ill after eating it even if I wanted to.
2007-09-29 10:51:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rooikat 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If it died of natural causes, it would be due to illness, right? And you really would NOT want to eat diseased meat, would you? Although I have to tell you, some of the stuff you get in the store is already diseased because of the horrid conditions of factory farms.
So, no, I wouldn't touch the stuff with a barge pole!
2007-09-29 16:01:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no reason to eat meat.
I'm never starving, meat does not make you healthier than someone that doesn't eat meat and I can make stuff that tastes like meat at home that doesn't have any cholesterol or saturated fat.
So, why would I want to be responsible for the death or suffering of any animal when the only reason to do so is to make myself feel superior to all other life on Earth? To do so does not sound modest or healthy(mentally or physically).
2007-09-29 11:48:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
If I needed to eat an animal to survive (e.g. I was stranded in the woods and starving, you get the idea) I wouldn't hesitate, I'd do what I needed to survive. That is the only circumstance in which I would eat meat.
2007-09-29 12:15:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by angelbelle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of the call for has little to do with it. I recommend the extra ppl call for meat than the extra animals they ought to advance and breed. however the ppl that "take care" of those animals are going to handle them the comparable no rely how plenty call for for them is. different than for perhaps in severe LOW call for, yet i do no longer see that occuring each time quickly. Plus i do no longer think of every person must be thinking approximately transforming into veggie in basic terms b/c of animal cruelty. you gets your meat from close by farms which you recognize the animals are being taken care of extremely. yet goin veggie is a decision of wellness, no longer animal's rights. yet i do no longer know if there are the different companies for animal rights. i know there is animal rescue, so if there's a farm it particularly is omit treating the animals then you definitely checklist them and that they arrive take a glance. yet maximum "meat" agencies stay interior regulation, however the animals are nonetheless misstreated, so as meaning we've been given to locate something to do. Plus with they way those animals are being taken care of, they'd seize affliction and particular finally end up in our stomachs.
2016-10-05 13:17:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Putting aside the 'gross' factor, I see no ethical reason not to, unless there were scavengers that depended on the carcass. I don't need the dead animal, but they do.
2007-09-29 11:21:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
OF COURSE I WOULDNT EAT NATURALLY KILLED ANIMALS!!!
Because it would spoil the fun!
2007-09-29 15:23:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋