English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-28 22:28:08 · 11 answers · asked by sweetie1995 4 in Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Photography

11 answers

if you're talking about focal length, there is no such focal length cos it's too wide.

but if hypothetically there is, then 1mm will be wider than 6mm. (1mm will give you a wider angle of view than 6mm).

so if you actually have a lens that's 1-6mm, then it means that you can have the widest of 1mm field of view and zoom to a limit of 6mm.

2007-09-29 04:14:33 · answer #1 · answered by Benjymocha 2 · 1 0

6mm is 6/1000 of a meter and 1mm is 1/1000 of a meter. 6mm is six times the amount of 1mm. Exciting huh!

2007-09-28 22:57:48 · answer #2 · answered by Piano Man 4 · 3 0

Actually, the difference between 6mm and 1mm is not 5mm as suggested, as that sum includes either the 1st mm or the 6th. If there is something of 1mm and another of 6mm there is actually only 4mm difference between them - the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th mms.

2007-09-29 00:04:59 · answer #3 · answered by rdenig_male 7 · 1 3

1 millimeter is a very, very small unit of measure. The foil from a gum wrapper may be thicker than one milimeter. (if you include the paper backing)

Six millimeters is six times more. A household aluminum cooking foil may be closer to six milimeters.

I just checked in my kitchen. My box of Reynolds Wrap all purpose foil is labled as 6.96 mm.

Sorry, "rdenig_male," but you got it wrong. If you were to stack a series of 1mm "things," you'd measure it's aggregate thickness from the bottom of one substrate to the TOP of the pile. In this theoretical stack of six, the pile is six milimeters thick. Remove ONE of these "things," and you'd be left with a stack measuring five millimeters. (still measuring from the bottom of the stack to the top of the stack. You would NOT measure from the top of the bottom one, to the bottom of the top one.

And, the simple arithmetic proves this to be true.

Question to "Un Doe Nee." How thick is your recording tape?

2007-09-29 12:20:36 · answer #4 · answered by Vince M 7 · 0 0

well its caculated to show the thickness of a product .

Its simple as this, 6 mm is six times more than 1 mm.

Have fun,

barbara

2007-09-28 22:35:17 · answer #5 · answered by Barbara A 2 · 2 1

I guess the operative question here is, "In reference to what?"

The obvious answer is 5mm. But I can't believe you don't know enough simple arithmetic to come up with that answer yourself.

So, what are you really asking?

2007-09-29 01:40:35 · answer #6 · answered by Nihl_of_Brae 5 · 3 0

Another product of the public school system.

Will probably be governor some day.

2007-09-29 05:09:16 · answer #7 · answered by photoguy_ryan 6 · 1 0

emmm... 6mm-1mm=5mm, i think.

2007-09-28 23:46:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

no such things in film/movies/digital tape/medias sorry

a

2007-09-29 03:42:29 · answer #9 · answered by Antoni 7 · 1 0

What did you really want to know?

2007-09-28 22:47:28 · answer #10 · answered by DougF 5 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers