English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it due to weight / cost / complicated machinery?

2007-09-28 20:24:11 · 4 answers · asked by dee dee dee (mencia) 3 in Politics & Government Military

4 answers

they do exist take as example the AMOS system a breech loading 120 mm mortar mounted in a turret with a firing speed up to 26 round a minute thanks to a automatic loading system
The drawback is that it has a relative large price if you planning to buy one

2007-09-29 07:07:13 · answer #1 · answered by general De Witte 5 · 1 0

The same reason that US tank cannons are still manually loaded - auto-loaders are complicated and break easily. And a broken loader = useless weapon.

Yup, I watch the military channel.

Just wanted to add another problem with auto-loaders specifically for mortars: Since they are indirect, high trajectory weapons, the barrel is always pointed up. This would require an auto-loading device that either sits on top of the barrel (gravity feeds the round down onto the firing pin) and then clears itself out of the way in time, or an auto-loading device underneath the barrel - in which case it would no longer be a simple, functional mortar. It would just be a complicated, high-trajectory, auto-cannon that fires mortar rounds.

2007-09-28 20:33:44 · answer #2 · answered by Patriotic Libertarian 3 · 2 0

This has been tried in various armies around the world, the problem is the loading mechanism tends to jam at the most awkward moment after a few round.

2007-09-28 20:53:07 · answer #3 · answered by conranger1 7 · 0 0

Of course there are. They are not that complicated. Unable to divulge more info other than its similar in principle to an automatic rifle or machine gun.

2007-09-28 20:54:18 · answer #4 · answered by CAPTAIN BEAR 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers