2007-09-28 19:19:27 · 14 answers · asked by gannoway 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
you just named four of the most capable military nations on tha planet, although i guess Israel and Austrailia both lack sufficient technologically advanced forces en masse to survive long in such a conflict. and why would anyone go nuclear? nukes are seen by everyone besides terrorists as being at most tools to get rid of American carrier battle groups, and usually as deterrents. it would eventually boil down to the rest of NATO, China, and Russia vs. the US and UK. and then who knows? Russia has quite an air force and army, though their navy is in the dumps right now, China is modernizing their forces, and NATO is of course a Western fighting force, mainly armed by the US, UK, France, and Germany. The US has impressive everything, and the UK has good tanks, infantry, and a small but capable air force. the battlefield and whoever attacks first would decide it, in my opinion.
2007-09-29 19:19:00 · answer #1 · answered by F-14D Super Tomcat 21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
australia would be the first to go because no1 would care about nuking them because they cant nuke back.
i think great britian would go second (their air force isnt as good as israel or america)
than it would be israel
and america would obvioulsly win
(but (and a very big but) if america where to attack israel or great britian with nukes-america would be nuked too-so bassically the outcome of the war would be the distrection of most of the western world)
2007-09-30 12:07:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Our world is already attacking all of these countries by global warming and changes in weather patterns creating droughts and severe storms causing devastation, all countries in the world should all join together in the fight to save the planet.
2007-09-28 20:04:09 · answer #3 · answered by Riley 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, I think the whole world would win. With drastic overpopulation plaguing the nations of Earth, what we need is another World War to cull down the population a bit. Give us a bit more living space.
2007-09-28 19:33:35 · answer #4 · answered by Gotta have more explosions! 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
And just who is the world team composed of ??
Who will lead it ???
Do you really think you could pull together enough countries long enough to form an allience without squabbles over who will be in charge and whats in it for them??
Time to visit the real world sonny!!
2007-09-28 20:56:08 · answer #5 · answered by conranger1 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nobody would win, but China and America would emerge as the last remaining Superpowers, and half the world would be smoldering ruins.
2007-09-28 19:27:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nobody we'd all be graveyard dead by the time they got through throwing Nukes back and forth.
Back to Chapter 1 of Genius: And the world was dark and void without life.
2007-09-28 19:30:30 · answer #7 · answered by JUAN FRAN$$$ 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
there wouldnt be many winners or survivors for that matter. remember that when countries get desperate, they start just trying not to go down. start throwing wild strikes. this isnt 1945 when governemtns faught governments and someone would see that a war was lost and honorably meet and sign an agreement.
2007-09-28 19:25:21 · answer #8 · answered by Para-diddle 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
the whole world
you need to be a little more specific, i dont see the people of easter island doing to much damage to us
2007-09-28 19:30:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nobody. The World would go up in flames- and THAT would be the END of this story... :(
2007-09-28 19:28:09 · answer #10 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋