then throw him in?
2007-09-28 16:54:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pets ➔ Dogs
yes it is unethical ..."Two Wrongs Don't Make A Right"
But i wish him a very long jail time and that other a.$$ named DMX should join him .
And i would add a little kick for Mr. Vick .............
2007-09-28 17:01:31 · answer #1 · answered by Erdnusslöckchen 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I like that idea except for having to starve the dogs first. I would starve Vick for a week, then right when he is at his weakest put him in a closed ring with a hungry tiger as he hung upside down from a tree, and have spectators betting on who will win, as the tiger stalks and swats at him. That's what I call pay back. Make him mess up his pants in front of everyone.
2007-09-29 00:03:32 · answer #2 · answered by Bogus 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's not unethical to think it, but to act it out would be. ; )
Besides, the breed would likely be worried about him and try to comfort him not knowing how to be sadistic and cruel like he was.
I think the best treatment for Vick would be to put him back to work at his big money job and take half his salary for five yrs to be used for Pit Bull rescue orgs in his area and law enforcement for breaking up fighting rings. In those five years, he could also have strictly enforced community service every single week where he would do volunteer work for Pit Bull rescues around the country that he would pay his own transportation to and from, that deal with the breed and with rehabbing dogs that have been used for bait and for fighting. He'd have to get to know the breed and all it's incredible characteristics and as he nurtured them back to health. Maybe that would get through to whatever is broken in him that made him do what he did to that breed.
2007-09-29 00:08:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
for what he did to my favorite most close to heart breed, the only breed i will EVER have and always will have. hmmm.... i dont think thats enough . i say all is fine but replace the pits with hungry lions and make his friends who were in it with him watch but not be able to help. then i beleive they should all meet that same fate. one by one, watching each other being eaten by hungry, indifferent lions.
he abused and solicited a powerful, beautiful animal by doing what he did to these dogs, but he should see there are bigger more powerful animals whom he could never obtain control of. n those animals should be the death of him.
2007-09-29 01:43:59 · answer #4 · answered by Athena S 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I did/do not agree with what Vick did but this question is not necessary. Maybe you should accidently let them turn on you!
2007-09-29 01:43:49 · answer #5 · answered by ACE 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oh yeah because they will turn mean on you they will never be the same, if you bleed they will attack you their owner. It is a bad idea just train them to be gaurd dogs it is mean to the dog they have a chance of being put to sleep and all this legal stuff could go on it is a bad idea if you ask me
2007-09-29 01:03:00 · answer #6 · answered by emma 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why? They'd just lick him a lot and ask him in body language for some food.
2007-09-29 01:10:02 · answer #7 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It kinda defeats the cause buddy....this stuff needs to stop. I'm afraid we're going to have to be the bigger person.
2007-09-28 23:59:31 · answer #8 · answered by Liz H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be crual to the dogs..but vick deserves it.
2007-09-29 00:02:26 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am getting soooo tired of hearing about this stuff.
2007-09-29 00:01:44 · answer #10 · answered by SpringRose 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋