It's well-known that the company has video rolling during their missions, for various reasons. If the company was really using justified force during the now-famous shooting incident that seems to have gotten them into trouble, then the video will show it. They have nothing to lose by releasing the video... unless, of course, the video shows something they don't want people to see...
What do people make of this? Why doesn't Blackwater just release the unedited video, and clear their name?
2007-09-28
13:38:48
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
EDIT: National security doesn't strike me as a very good argument, since dozens of private security contractor videos of various incidents have already been released.
2007-09-28
13:45:10 ·
update #1