No.
It is time for all of those countries who have been criticizing us to step up to the plate and deal with the issue on their own.
2007-09-28 08:49:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by MikeGolf 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Plain & Simple No, there is no reason what so ever for any other country to involve themselves in Burma's internal struggle.
2007-09-28 15:06:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by conranger1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. Burma does not have oil.
There is obviously a resistance movement in Burma.. I hope the US and UK have learned from their experience in Iraq, and would help the locals (who know the culture and local politics) to remove the junta and establish a viable deomcratic government,
2007-09-28 12:12:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by mr_fartson 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
not a chance,there may be a request for limited military aid but not troop involvment,also,with the bad press the USA/UK are getting because of iraq/iran no president or prime minister is going to go down as the one who committed ground troops to that area,never going to happen
2007-10-02 09:58:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by the devil wears camo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there is military force used there... it would only be a limited conflict. At most, air strikes or a limited cruise missle strike. But neither one of those would accomplish much to stop the violence.
So no, very doubtful.
2007-09-28 12:17:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Patriotic Libertarian 3
·
0⤊
1⤋