To all "Creationists" What version should be taught in the classroom?

Question

The Christian version? Buddhist version? Hindu version? Muslim version? Native American version? The little tribe in South America version?

This is a serious question. Because science only has one version to teach.

Answer 1

You raise a valid point that many choose to ignore - a country based, in part, on freedom of religion cannot discriminate against any religion, even if they are the minority. (This is similar to the adamance about keeping "under God" in the pledge.) Of course, if you take the religion out of the science like the seperation of church and state says you should, then you're left with no possibility of discrimination.
And I don't believe that catholic crusader realizes that in the scientific community, a "theory" is about as far as willing to go these days - things don't become fact for centuries, even with full support by all knowledgable persons and no evidence to the contrary.

Answer 2

First of all evolution is not science. It is a paradigm. It, too has its own little version of "In the beginning." Big Bang, forming stars and planets, pre-biotic soup, and so forth. Also, many evolutionists are at odds with each other, with groups trying to promote their own theories while disparaging others'.
One thing that should be considered is that evolution offends anyone who believes in a Creator.
The Christian and Muslim creation account come from the book of Genesis. Buddhism is an offshoot of Hinduism. Various tribes stick to themselves, so there is no need to teach Californian kids the "Pawnee" creation account. I think it is funny that evolutionists jokingly suggest that the Norse creation account be taught in schools. They then try to lump Genesis in the same category as all the other crazy creation stories. However, they never seem to be able to see the problems with their own belief. They strain at the gnat of creation and swallow the camel of evolution. Study this subject thoroughly with a mind that is both open enough to let new ideas in and critical enough to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Answer 3

maximum of human beings at present are complicated biblical creationism with sensible layout. "sensible layout is the learn of varieties in nature that are superb defined through fact the end results of intelligence" (Dr. William Dembski). it is it; it says no longer something of who the author is and how he/she/it/they did it. sensible layout encompasses each and every "creation" tale, even extraterrestrial beings seeding existence on the planet. maximum Christians i know do no longer prefer biblical creationism taught in technology training. What we prefer is for molecules-to-guy evolution to examine with all its warts (they do no longer look to be even allowed to contemporary data that would positioned evolution in a unfavourable gentle). And we prefer sensible layout to a minimum of to be provided. in assessment to leprechauns and a flat earth, etc., an considerable proportion of the (tax paying) inhabitants believes in identity.

Answer 4

I believe the classroom should teach exactly what science has discovered. As we teach our children of creation, they will be able to take facts from science to begin to support much of the information that is accounted in the bible. It's our job as parents to educate our children about God.

Answer 5

The Pastafarian version, of course.

Answer 6

Teach science in the science classes, and religion in religion classes.

Answer 7

No particular version. Just teach the science of it and that it is a "theory", just like evolution out of nothing is a "theory".
Why should one theory be advanced and another supressed.

I often think about how the Church is accused of supressing Galileo, but public schools do the same thing when they supress other theories.

Answer 8

if all were taught then the young would see that they have a choice of what to believe or to look for answers else where. I say all. call it history, social science whatever

Answer 9

the intelligent design crowd think that they are being sneaky by whitewashing ID "theories" and making them generic. but they still make critical assertions that out their agenda for what it is, such as referencing only one god as the creator. how could this possibly be known, even if the universe were created via ID?

Answer 10

I think all versions should be taught. Why not?