2007-09-28 03:11:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
if you dont understand the question then dont answer it
leave that to the smart people
2007-09-28 03:17:35 · update #1
fact the earth is more than 12,000 years old
evolution
that prayer doesnt work....
the list is endless
2007-09-28 03:22:12 · update #2
Politics :)
2007-09-28 03:17:28 · answer #1 · answered by nixity 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, science.
That fact of the Matter is Pluto circles the sun. Pluto was discovered through Newton's body problems on a predictable basis.
Science chooses to ignore these facts.
Astroids are NOT discovered by MATH predictions but accidentally by observation, just like comets.
Cylde Tombaugh knew where pluto was to be found and looked there and found it.
Science chooses to ignore these facts
Science decided to re-write astronomy as taught in the schools for half a century.
Then there is the AETHER which gets replaced or displaced by STRING theory.
And since Einstein HAS to be right we won't even consider the existance of a Positron because it breaks the rules.
Science is practising closed minded thinking.
It's our way or the highway
Where are the SCIENTIFIC FACTS if different scientists disagree on IF or IF NOT Neaderthal and Erectus coexisted or didn't coexist.
Where are the FACTS if two different time lines can be postualted.
Obviously there are no facts, just speculation.
If there were facts, one would have to accept them.
Then we have the evolutionary altercations.
The traditional Darwinist approach of MAN decesnding (or ascending) from Primates vs the COMMON ANCESTOR responsible jointly for MAN, NEATHERTHAL, ERECTUS, CHIMPS, ORANGUATANGS
Once again where are the facts and why do they lead to two radically different time lines.
2007-09-28 10:32:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Seeing as you stated no facts to back up this wild assertion, I can only assume your question was based on absolutely nothing, other than a stab at trying to call Christians ignorant, but you managed to prove yourself ignorant of the 'facts' as well.
2007-09-28 10:18:04 · answer #3 · answered by b g 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What "facts" are you referring to? How does religion require any of us to ignore "facts". Don't make a claim you can't even back up. Religion in general explores things that science hasn't been able to resolve, ultimately there aren't any "facts" which explain the orgin of all things.
2007-09-28 10:17:55 · answer #4 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
are you referring to the atheist religion ? that is the only one that ignores facts
2007-09-28 10:18:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love.
2007-09-28 10:15:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand the question...
2007-09-28 10:15:13 · answer #7 · answered by Heck if I know! 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would definitely say love and lust.
2007-09-28 10:15:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
politics.
2007-09-28 10:15:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋