oh my god, how can everyone be so wrong about this?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!
if you DONT cut down trees, they will either die and rot, or they will catch fire in a forest fire. there is NO alternative. rotting or burning BOTH release all the stored up carbon in the tree. you DO realize that trees are carbon based beings, don't you???? if you cut down trees, and replant new ones, the carbon in the wood is trapped there. the best way is to cut down the oldest trees, that are not growing any more. they are very inefficient at converting CO2 into O2, just like old people don't eat much, but teen agers eat like pigs. it works the same way with trees. it isn't just a coincidence that this increase in CO2 levels happened right after we stopped cutting down old growth forests, and decided to let those old trees die and rot, or burn up in fires
2007-09-28 03:37:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by iberius 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Harvesting timber and replanting actually will help fight global warming. Trees through photosynthesis convert CO2 to wood. As long as that wood is present whether it is in tree form or lumber form, that carbon is stored in a solid state. Younger trees, the ones that are planted in the harvested area, actually store carbon at a faster rate.
Trees also produce CO2. They use the sugars (C6 H12 O6) they produce during photosynthesis. This is called respiration. Just like us, the tree uses oxygen to break down the sugar molecule and CO2 is released into the air. As a tree ages the amount of carbon released into the air increases. It releases carbon into the air via respiration, rotting leaf fall, and rotting fallen branches. At a certain age carbon release catches up to the amount of carbon stored as wood. This is why trees die of old age. They can no longer produce the amount of energy they need to stay alive. So, the best thing to do is to cut it down and replant more that store carbon quickly in the form of wood.
For more detailed study research Carbon Sequestration.
2007-09-28 07:25:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ray s 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If GW is caused by carbon dioxide, then trees and other plants should help to reduce atmospheric CO2.
Trees that are growing take CO2 from the air, strip the carbon (C) and release the oxygen (O2). The tissue in the growing tree is produced from the carbon that it sequesters from the atmosphere. When the trees get older, they grow slower and the carbon is sequestered at a slower rate. When the tree dies, the tissue decays and releases the carbon back into the atmosphere in the form of CO2.
If logging companies cut old growth and replant as the go, the dead trees will not rapidly decay and the new trees that are planted will continue to sequester carbon. Most logging companies replant, because it is in their best interest. It is their future business.
2007-09-28 02:57:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Larry 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Cutting down trees allows us to sequester carbon and keep it out of the atmosphere for hundreds of years. All we need to do is not allow the tree to rot or burn. Build houses with them, if you want. Bury ithemt (deep) if you like. For carbon sequestering, it doesn't matter which. Either way, that carbon will be temporarily removed from the atmospheric carbon cycle.
Want to do this most efficiently? Cut down the "old growth" trees. Trees sequester atmospheric carbon into their bodies (wood), but they only do this while they are growing. Mature trees are not growing more wood. Because they are not prowing more wood, their net effect on carbon is zero. Cut them down and replant. The new trees will sequester carbon from the atmosphere until they are grown, repeating the cycle.
2007-09-28 15:02:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by G_U_C 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cutting down Trees effects global warming because carbon dioxide plays a part in photolysis's. So if you cut down the trees least carbon that we have caused is being used up which creates the green house effect an raises the world temperature
2007-09-28 00:38:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by unwakeable 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
particular! scaling down trees impacts worldwide warming in 2 strategies: a million) The trees are not from now on soaking up CO2 from the ambience so as to boost, so no CO2 is being taken from the ambience. 2) The trees the two rot or are burned, the two one in all which launch their stored CO2 into the ambience, contributing to worldwide warming. previous trees soak up much less CO2 than youthful trees, so an previous tree isn't doing a lot to soak up CO2 besides. The trick is to minimize basically previous trees and replace each and every tree you minimize down with a sparkling youthful tree (this frequently would not take place, regrettably). Planting new trees is considerable through fact CO2 can efficiently get trapped interior the trees until they are minimize down. desire this enables!
2016-10-09 23:23:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cutting down trees affects global warming because trees inhale carbon dioxide. Now there is too much carbon dioxide in the air and that's one of the things causing global warming.
2007-09-28 00:29:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by NJW 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
CO2 is the major component of global warming. It traps radiation that would normally escape into space and warms the atmosphere. Trees remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Fewer trees more CO2.
2007-09-28 00:31:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by BRIAN K 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
It doesn't. People think it does, but they are wrong.
The trees take in CO2 and use it to make wood. The wood of the tree IS trapped CO2. Cutting the tree does not release that CO2, and it makes room for another tree to grow and make more wood which traps more CO2.
2007-09-28 04:27:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The forests of the earth are believed to contain around 2/3 of the earth's carbon. Burning them returns this quantity to the atmosphere, where most of the balance already is. Trees along with other plant life are the sole mechanism to remove carbon from the atmosphere.
2007-09-28 01:08:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋