Do you think there is enough Proof that Global Warming is caused by a Polar Shift?

Question

The melting of the polar regions has thrown off the balance of the earth. As the glaciers have nearly melted, the weight at the north pole has decreased. This has allowed the heavier, wider portion of the earth at the equator to start slipping downward, thus increasing the tilt significantly.


Why has no one noticed?
It did not slip all at once. It has been a slow change over the past 20 years, but two of the most significant axial shifts occurred between Dec 4 and 6, 2006.

Despite common misperception, an event like this can happen silently rather than a catastrophic sudden change. A 2000 mile shift would not be felt any more than you can feel the rotation of the earth. The earth rotates nearly 25,000 miles every day. About 1038 miles every hour. You cannot feel a 2000 mile change in the axis any more than you can feel the earth rotate or orbit the sun.
http://www.divulgence.net/How%20and%20Why.html#What%20caused%20the%20slippage?
http://curezone.com/blogs/fm.asp?i=98542

Answer 1

HAHAHA

I'm sorry, but I couldn't help myself.

I actually have SCIENTIFIC DATA to support my claim: Global Warming in the 21st century is a natural phenomenon.



Here is some scientific data I collected over the past few years.

1) 'From 1986 to 2000 central antarctic valleys colled .7 degrees C per decade with serious ecosystem damage from cold' (Antarctic climate cooling and terrestrial ecosystem response, Nature 415, 517-520)

2)the mean temperature in Punta Arenas (closest city to Antarctica) has decreased by roughly .7 degrees C from 1888 to 2004 (giss.nasa.gov)

3) 1940 to 1970, the mean temperature went DOWN while CO2 lvs RISED (giss.nasa.gov)

4) "although it's tempting to blame the ice loss on global warming, researchers think that DEFORESTATION of the mountain's foothills is more likely the culprit" (www.nature.con/nsu/031117/031...

5) hurricane strikes by the decade 1900-2004: the number of hurricanes is going down (www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastdec/shtm...

6) according to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, "Examination of meteorological data fails to support the perception [of increased frequencly and severity of extreme climate events] in the context of a long-term climate change"

7) "Overall, there is no evidence that exptreme weather events, or climate variability, has increased, in a global sense, throughought the twentieth century" (IPCC, Climate Change 1995)






Sorry, i have a LOT more, but I just used 30min re-finding these instead of studying for AP calc test tomorrow. Cheers.
Source(s):
Source(s):

Listed sources next to quotes...Also spent a lot of time researching this, from 2000-2006. Pretty interesting stuff, the fate of our planet.

Answer 2

Sorry but I have no idea what the websites you linked to are going on about (and I understand about the movement of the planet in space).

The basis seems to be that the Earth's axial tilt has increased from it's normal 23.5° to 46° - this is perhaps one of the most proposterous claims anyone could make. If that happened the climate zones of the world would be in disarray - we're talking California becoming like Alaska or London becoming like Cairo.

Not only that but time zones around the globe would have changed radically, it would get darker and lighter up to 4 hours earlier, parts of Australia for example would now have 6 months darkness followed by 6 months daylight.

Satellite communications around the globe would have been lost, there would be catastrophic flooding of Biblical proportions, mass extinctions etc.

To put it into some sort of context - there are 6.6 billion people on the planet, the amount of ice lost each year is equivalent to one 6.8 billionth of the Earth's mass (882 cubic kilometres of ice against the mass of the Earth which is approx 6 septillion tons).

What the websites are trying to acheive is anyone's guess.

Answer 3

There are not any continuously melting polar ice caps. They soften and then freeze lower back lower back. that is completely established. guy-made worldwide warming is fake. that is in easy terms a narrative made up via governments and politicians to scare human beings and earn themselves huge time funds. that is common for Earth's temperature to selection, and that's especially by way of solar's interest. alterations in Earth's temperature have surpassed off until now, and could proceed to ensue.

Answer 4

So you're saying global warming is caused by a polar shift, which itself is caused by the melting of ice in polar regions over the past twenty years. You do realise that logically a cause must precede its effect, right?

Answer 5

A general understanding of how angular momentum works would have helped you a lot in formulating this theory.

Answer 6

No there is much more evidence it is caused by an increase in solar activity.

Answer 7

ye, everything you say is pretty much right -- still, how easy would it be to shift the answer from"right" to your "wrong"...

...think about it