Is ignoring creation evidence robbing science?

Question

Europe is voting on banning any scientific evidence that supports creationism from the public schools. This reminds me of Hitler buring books the Nazi Party didn't agree with.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070925/sc_nm/europe_creationism_dc

Shouldn’t the schools let the evidence speak and not censor things simply because it could have religious implications? Why the need censor this evidence? What ever happened to the free flow of information?

Answer 1

You are right on the money! Creation doesn't rebuke science at all. Yahweh did give us minds. He's given us numerous revelations to His existence through not only faith, but science as well. But when people try to concoct ideas that ignore reality, it isn't logic or science. It's just hate.

There's NOTHING random about DNA. Billy Gates himself said it was like a computer program written on a level far more superior than anything we could ourselves fathom. Our position in the universe is mathematically perfect. Why? To sustain life perhaps? No amount of random stupidity can create perfection. Getting the answer wrong enough times wont eventually get a correct response. 0 + 0 + 0 will never equal 1. Not today, tomorrow, or in 4.5 million tomorrows. Evolution is logically impossible and implausible.

Evolution is simply another of man's failed attempts at denouncing the Father. Plain and simple. That would explain why they have such an exclusive and vulgar animosity towards Christians in general. Instead of teaching people that we evolved from absolutely nothing and are without purpose, rhyme or reason, they should let people examine the evidence for themselves. But for fear of a conclusion, they've censored it.

They've looked past the obvious and in turn given our children survival of the fittest in exchange for human purpose. They've given us random mutation in exchange for a creative touch. Primal instinct in exchange for love. Evolution has demonic influence written all over it. What hope does one truly have when since childhood he defines himself as a worthless random 'mutation'. A mistake. Even a beast has more sense. Only Satan himself would hate mankind enough to derive such a repulsive concept. That's just sick.

Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, and Stalin were all atheists. Can we begin to see the implications? Evolution and atheism are not just lies. They are venomous and deadly deceptions.

Answer 2

There is no evidence for creation... that's why it is not science.

For example,... Science makes predictions that should be verifiable. Before the discovery of DNA, scientists thought that chimps and humans should be biologically similar. Consequently, we discovered that humans and chimps have nearly 99% similar DNA, and less in common than with, say, frogs.
I.D. simply states that life is too complex to not have been designed. Where is the evidence of that??? That is making an assumption without even trying to see if the assumption can be disproven! This is not how science works.

Answer 3

Actual scientific evidence that supports creationism should not be banned. However, just because a Creationist calls it science doesn't make it science. Everything in a science textbook should be science. There shouldn't be some sort of ban on certain non-science topics - it should unilateral, and it should be figured out with common sense.

Answer 4

CREATIONISM ISN'T SCIENCE, we should only be teaching scientific theory, and facts along with hypothesis. Religion is mere fantasy, folk lore, and fiction. There are no basis for religion and all of its teaching are against religious ideas. Really is the Earth the center of the Universe, or only 10,000 years old. It was only religious people that thought the earth was flat because the Bible told us it was.

Answer 5

Europe has a different take on free speech; they traditinionally accept certain curtailments to preserve society (not justifying, just observing).

The problem is people try to mispreresent BS as evidence; Europe apparently has had enough of it.

It's a far cry from Hitler.

Answer 6

Yeah, letting people teach whatever version of the facts they like in schools is a really good idea...

It's not censorship. It's ensuring that school education stays within the realm of facts. By your logic, Holocaust deniers and 9/11 truthers should also be allowed to teach their opinions in schools. Hopefully, with this measure, we Europeans won't get ourselves into the mess you have.

Answer 7

Please present scientific evidence of creationism.

This is what the news article you posted said: "The message we wanted to send was to avoid creationism passing itself off as science and being taught as science. That's where the danger lies."

This is the reason why we don't want creationism taught in schools.

Answer 8

Science is not politics. You actually need testible, verifiable evidence gathered by the scientific method and reviewed by scientific peers for reliability and validity to cut it in science.

Answer 9

There is no evidence for it, there are just things that are being twisted by unscrupulous religious leaders for their own ends. That is why it should not be allowed in school. Unless it's in religious education of course. (We have that as a subject in most of Europe).

Answer 10

I think science will get over the robbery.


If I remember correctly it is the idiot fundies who want to, and in fact did burn copies of The Origin of Species among other science based books, in the South.

*sigh*