Please insert your personal script into a University program and link the code for courses in biology, chemistry, anthropology, geology, genetics, paleontology, anatomy and physiology to your system and run these programs for 8 years to the level of PhD. This will solve your doubt.
Take the blue pill.
2007-09-25 02:53:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I think the best evidence for evolution is in bacteria are viruses. The most common example is that of the ability of some bacteria to develop resistance to certain antibiotics. I think these examples adequately prove micro-evolution.
Personally, however, I will not believe in macro-evolution until speciation can be demonstrated. So far scientist have been unable to reproductively isolate any organism.
2007-09-25 09:55:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by gerafalop 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
"I feel like it is impossible"? Sorry, feeling have no bearing here, we don't do science on what we feel or believe, we use data and facts. Do you feel that your cell phone shouldn't work as it's based on several different sciences? What about the medicine that helps you or your loved ones get better, do you feel that that should be impossible to believe in?"
Evolution is clearly explained on many website and in many books. There is a large amount of evidence for it, including transitional fossils. I suggest that you actually read about it and not on a "pseudo-science" creationist site. It will take some time as the information is complex and requires an understanding of several related sciences.
2007-09-25 09:58:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pirate AM™ 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Evolutionism is where a living being (mammal, bug, fish, plants, ect) change and adapt to their enviroment. Sorry, we did not come from monkeys even though there are similiarities it is not so. There were thousands of species of the same genus over thousands of years just some were stronger, smarter, faster, or easily adaptable to change than others. Many of those species are extinct but many have evolved into a smaller or larger version of the original based on enviromental changes on the earth.
The skeletal remains of a horse was no larger than a medium sized dog but yet the horse - in many variations due to its environments - have changed over thousands of years. The Mastadon no longer exists but its descendants that were stronge enough to adapt to the rising temperatures survived. The saber tooth cat - mountain lion today, the great white shark is just less of a third of its original size. Some animals were not effected by evolution because their food source(mostly plant eaters) and their adaptability to rapid changing climates or increased cold or warm climate was easier to live in, so hence, not much change except maybe color or length or type of hair. We are an evolved species of homo erectus not from the apes. Our ancestors changed and adapted to changing enviroments and advanced brain function helped us with problem solving skills which allowed us to be in social groups, reasoning capable, problem solving, imagination, even though we have lost much of our animal insticts over time. This is evolution not from one species to the next but a progression of our own species over a large period of time.
2007-09-25 10:34:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Karma of the Poodle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Quit nitpicking man. You don't believe it, that's fine. I don't care! But I spent a lot of that time studying Geology and Earth Sciences (degrees) to know the planet is round, not the center of the universe, and came to be more than 6000 years ago. Why do you debate evolution, and not any other of the Church's long held beliefs that are considered just foolish these days?
2007-09-25 09:52:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Master C 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Millions and millions of creatures and plants buried in the earth at various depths (in the form of fossils) indicate a time sequence of living forms that leads directly to the things living today. The conclusion is inescapable that the mechanism for this development is biological evolution thru natural selection.
2007-09-25 09:52:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Right, it's a much more likely possibility that thousands and thousands of scientists have decided to embark on an international conspiracy to plant fossils around the world and pretend that genetic variations occur between generations. I'm sure they're in it for the money.
2007-09-25 09:50:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Your appendix, for one. Vestigial limbs/organs, i.e. a body part that serves a useful purpose on some other animal (hind legbones on whales, anyone?) but, due to evolution, is no longer needed but is still coded into the DNA.
2007-09-25 09:50:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by 006 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Go to the library and check out a book. Most people who believe in God, by the way, do believe in evolution, bacteria, other galaxies -- none of those are an impediment to belief.
2007-09-25 09:51:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by bonitakale 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Transitional fossils. Vestigial organs. DNA.
Animals have proven that there are degrees of emotional capacity. Many animals can feel sadness, happiness, jealousy to greater or lesser degrees....
Also, many animals have senses more highly advanced than ours, others have less acute senses. The spectrum is apparent.
2007-09-25 09:48:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Eleventy 6
·
9⤊
1⤋