if you believe in darwins evolution then?

Question

then you must believe that life came from NON-LIVING material and this is impossible,if you go back far enough.

Answer 1

More impossible than Sky Daddy molding dirt? 8-/

LOL!

Answer 2

Darwin avoided the subject of abiogenesis. That theory (Primordial Soup) was put out by a Russian scientist in the 1930s. The Panspermia theory (life came to earth on comets) just relocates the origin - doesn't resolve it.

It is obvious you are not really familiar with Darwin's theory.

There have been other theories about the origin of life from inert matter. Maybe you're curious, and will seek to expand your knowledge in this subject. I truly doubt it, though.

Answer 3

probably simply by fact Darwin got here up with the mechanism by ability of which evolution works (or a minimum of the organic determination area). an excellent style of scientists interior the early nineteenth century found out that evolution ought to ensue, simply by fact there is a lot information of it interior the fossil record and in anatomy and taxonomy. they only weren't particular the way it worked. Darwin provided an magnificent and stylish theory, alongside with massive documented information to back it up. maximum folk of working earth and organic and organic scientists flocked to the reason simply by fact it became needless to say proper.

Answer 4

Who knows where or how life started? Darwin's theory of evolution doesn't deal with where the first life came from. It deals with how living species evolve over time into different species.

Answer 5

care to elaborate hilarious i thought atheists where scientific and had all the facts based on provable evidence. i will elaborate on the relevant details. the big bang theory states after the big bang life originated from non-living material. this is not proven just assumed. scientists have actually little understanding of how this could happen, and they have no proof that it could. there is also something called the limited gene set pool. scientists have tried to deconstuct the simplest cell that exists, a mycoplasma on paper they have only been able to reduce it to 250 different components.in reality they found it could only be reduced to around 360. this means this cell needs roughly 360 different parts to exist all at the same time for it live.

Answer 6

Nope, evolution does not attempt to explain the origins of life.

That is a separate subject called abiogenesis.

And it most definitely is possible.

Answer 7

No comets came to earth providing the ingredients for life.

massive amounts of hydrogen mix with other substances making it rain for hundreds of years (say hello seas, then after a period of time the first marine life formed from microbes).

(Read genesis and see how god made earth and in what order, then google "how the world was made" and see how they explain it and in what order. exactly the same)


I am christian, and I am smart enough to realize that god didn't create earth in an instant he took his precious time, wouldn't you create something painstakingly if you wanted to charish it

Answer 8

The theory of evolution does not deal with abiogensis.

This has been explained in more detail in previous answers that I am sure you have read and understood and accepted.

Answer 9

Actually, you don't have to believe abiogenesis, since there is no direct evidence as of yet, whereas common descent has been demonstrated. Further, all the evidence indicates it is possible. There are no refutations of evolution that are devoid of lies.

Answer 10

If you can prove that life can't come from non-living matter, then you should get that published. you would probably win a Nobel prize, because it would contradict lots of published experiments and current abiogenesis theory.