well the buffallo can take one hell of a hit but the husky is the only vehicle not to produce a casualty
the abrams has been takin out by blasts to the side
2007-09-23 15:14:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Depends on what it is used for.
The soldiers and Marines I talked to raved about the Buffalo and the RG-32. Both vehicles are built "mine-resistant".
>an Abrams tank was destroyed by an IED, which denoted right under the tank, where the armour is thinnest. Such a blast would destroy any vehicle, including the Buffalo.
2007-09-23 22:28:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by wichitaor1 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
U.S- Abrams Tank
Terrorists- Toyota Pickup Truck
2007-09-23 22:23:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Popularity has nothing to do with vehicle strength.
Gerald, your information is innaccurate.
And as the last poster said, the answer to this question is an OPSEC (Operations Security) violation. The internet is a valuable tool, especially to insurgents, and while the true answer to this question is probably eluded to on other websites, you shouldn't just hand it out to everyone.
2007-09-23 22:27:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by isaacsprincess79 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
M1 Abrams tank
2007-09-24 03:21:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Peiper 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do not answer this question. If this is an insurgent you will be pointing him to vehicle to target.
Answering this question is an OPSEC violation. If the first dude is in the military he should be beaten. You idiot...do you ever think about anything outside of yourself?
2007-09-23 22:20:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by theGODwatcher_ 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Probably the Abrams tank.
2007-09-23 22:15:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by role_lasrever 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Abrams tank..
2007-09-23 22:16:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dr Sardonicus 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Strykers are incredibly popular right now.
2007-09-23 22:15:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by sirtanaka 5
·
0⤊
2⤋