Please note I neither want nor intend to harm any animals.
2007-09-23 13:34:46 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hmmm also I don't think any sort of torture would be fun.
2007-09-23 21:02:51 · update #1
Yes, but only if the animal is a crocodile or a shark and you have to be naked with no weapons but your bare hands.
2007-09-23 13:43:13 · answer #1 · answered by capekicks 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I do hope no animals were harmed in the framing of this question...
Do you really think that torturing animals would be "fun"? Because that would be sadistic, and sick...
And the answer is no, it is not OK. The Bible doesn't say it isn't a sin to dig a hole in the ground in front of your back door, either...but I wouldn't advise it. Your common sense ought to tell you that a hole right where you step out of your house would be a bad idea, since you would fall into it, and possibly break your leg.
I didn't have to dig a hole outside my door to know this.
And I didn't have to torture any animals to know that it would not be fun, either.
2007-09-23 13:53:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you don't want or intend to harm animals, why would you even ask such a question? Sounds pretty hypocritical. Is this something you think about a lot? Sure you said you don't want or intend to, but some people do things without intending to; sometimes they don't even realize what they've done until it's too late. Perhaps you should seek some therapy.
2007-09-23 13:57:13 · answer #3 · answered by kaz716 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what,..you do now not think of athiest have morals?? that human beings are born sadistic and vicious in basic terms to be made suitable via faith? in case you're taking a sadistic individual and provide him faith, you have a sadistic, non secular individual, dissimilar those human beings around, i'm specific,...you comprehend what i think of? i think of we are re-incarnated and human beings who torture animals probable had a coarse time of it the final time he or she went in the process the beast, perchance they have been burning cats final time right here or the time in the previous that. i advise, how else do you clarify people who're so tripped out with the intention to do a number of the main abhorrent and hennious (?) crap conceivable..brothers and sisters of those nutjobs who bypass on rampages talk approximately what chuffed care-unfastened lives they grew up in and might't have faith they could do the form of concern..they have been only "quiet".. m-hem, quiet...OR HE grew to become into HITLER RE-INCARNATE AND SOMTHING grew to become into ingesting AT HIM!! btw, torturing animals is incorrect, it grew to become into interior the sixteenth century and that's now.
2017-01-02 14:15:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
MG,
We are told to follow the laws of our country in the New Testament. Those laws generally include NOT torturing animals, at least in the USA. Have a wonderful week.
Thanks,
Eds
.
2007-09-23 13:40:48 · answer #5 · answered by Eds 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. And I don't care what the Bible says. It is wrong to torture animals PERIOD.
2007-09-23 13:51:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He says don't eat four legged animals and creatures without scales but everyone does.
2007-09-23 13:40:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I never listen to what the bible tells me--it's wrong to do because it's just plain stupid--that should be reason enough not to.
2007-09-23 13:50:23 · answer #8 · answered by starkneckid 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We should show respect for all life to the extent possible.
2007-09-23 13:54:38 · answer #9 · answered by Sal D 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
he did not say don't eat four legged animals >.<. He says you can eat four legged animals that have hooves, if they eat of the cod (grass). Example: pigs are four legged have hooves..but they dont eat grass. They eat slop :\.
2007-09-23 13:42:33 · answer #10 · answered by JunkYardPuppy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋