If you are against abortion, shouldn't you also be against chastity??

Question

Ok, so
1) An abortion, you say, kills a baby by removing the embryo.
Well,
2) Chastity kills MANY MANY babies. You kill them by not allowing their eggs and sperms to join.
The sperm that WOULD have joined with the egg (if you had done it) is blocked, and therefore that baby never comes into existence.
Because of your actions.
By not going to bed, you prevent that baby from being born, just as you would have if you would have gone to bed and gotten an abortion.

So if your religion is against abortion on the account of "murder" shouldn't it also be against chastity?
That 16 year old girl who got pregnant and was branded a murderer for not having the baby...well the same effect would hav happened if she wouldn't have done it in the first place. The baby wouldn't have happened either way.

So isn't it foolish to be against abortions b/c they are "killing" babies where by that logic, keeping one's virginity until marriage is also "killing?"

either way...the baby isn't going to be born.
It's just choice you make before, one you make after.
Cause and effect...I don't care at which point the baby exists, either way a child is not going to be born.

Think of it this way.
What if, you're mother (on the day of your conception) had said no? For whatever reason.
Would you be here today?
It would be the SAME as if she had gone and aborted you....SAME effect...

@outta here...DEFINITELY.
But, you cant blame us. Society has been around for only a few thousand years...paltry compared even to the existence of life on earth...but progress does exist, and therefore, so does hope.

Answer 1

Bad logic.

You said "Chastity kills MANY MANY babies. You kill them by not allowing their eggs and sperms to join." You can't kill something if isn't alive. It isn't alive until conception. You are trying to make a comparison between two entirely different things.

There's a difference in a baby not being conceived - and in conceiving a baby and then killing it deliberately.

How can you not see the difference? Your argument is not sound at all. Try something else, dude.

Answer 2

the chastity is what stops before the pregnancy can begin, so it's not murder. Abortion is murder because the pregnancy has already begun. It's really different. You're talking about birth control which is way different from murder. And you know women has periods right? so the eggs do gets discharged so should women be charged for periods?

Answer 3

Your logic is flawed. Prevention of life is not killing a life. How can you kill that which does not exist? This is not logical, at all.

Chastity, sexual purity, abstinence, whatever you want to call it, has nothing to do with procreation or the killing of a life. It has to do with an intimate act that should be reserved for a lifetime commitment - marriage.

Answer 4

You should have been around when the birth control pill became readily available to women in the 1960's. Pharmacists refused to fill prescriptions, women were kicked out of their churches, protesters were in the streets....it was ugly for several years.

Even today, the Catholic religion preaches against any kind of birth control....says it's a sin.

As a society, we are barely out of the trees...don't you agree?

Answer 5

Your reasoning isn't even logical, sorry.

I am pro-life and pro chastity. Sex was created for the enjoyment of 2 people who are married. That way, they are emotionally protected and a possible child would be welcomed.

God bless!

Answer 6

I'm sorry- but that's ridiculous. Something has to be conceived first into a life before it can be killed. The difference is having very strong willpower.

Answer 7

There is no baby until conception. That's why it's called conception.