2007-09-22 23:37:42 · 17 answers · asked by now how 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
recall your senses and answer...only... who has done it more?? And has been more destructive for this human society?
2007-09-23 00:19:51 · update #1
Bush
However, one life lost because of these monsters is one life too many.
(NOTE: Bin Laden, since 911 and the wars, and all the questions. I have found I can no longer trust the govt whatsoever and what the govt says about Bin Laden, I have no idea if it is true or not, if what he is saying is being twisted, or taken out of context, etc. What I do know that Bin Laden is pissed off at the USA for some legit reasons -- which most Americans don't have the sense to ask, what the reasons are. Most Americans know the govt lied to us about the war, so why in the world do we continue to believe anything they say?)
Peace
Jim
.
2007-09-22 23:51:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
OBL has called for the total destruction of western civilization.
Bush has every reason to be 'mad' about that.
We should all be happy that he has devoted his presidency to attempting to overt that.
Middle Easterns have by far killed more Middle Easterns since the beginning of the Iraqi War than the US has. The 1 million number is unsubstantiated and reflects total deaths.
2007-09-23 07:13:48 · answer #2 · answered by wider scope 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush. He killed more people in Iraq than Osama did in 9/11.
2007-09-23 08:01:46 · answer #3 · answered by Impiger 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
US soldiers in Iraq and Afganistan have killed a tiny fraction compared to Muslims killing each other. Why do Muslims jump to kill each other the minute the boot of a brutal dictator is away from their neck???
2007-09-23 06:57:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
bush and osama have probably killed just as musch people as each other though thier intentions have been different osama's intentions are to basically destroy and conquer but bush's is apparently for world peace though how ironic that people have to die to obatin peace!
2007-09-23 06:45:11 · answer #5 · answered by tihor m 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
neither, my vote is for out of control liberal extremists who preach philosophy like unilateral surrender. you clearly saw the effects in viet nam as this country abandoned its allies and a nation and should the pelosi/reid regime get its way, youll see it again in iraq as the soldiers are left dangling. this may not be direct killing but it surely puts not only soldiers in harms way but leaves the sacrifice of many to provide freedom for this country hollow and mocked.
2007-09-23 06:43:33 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
They may have put out orders for things, but I know I have killed more men in combat than the both of them.
Oh . . . I'm not ashamed of that fact either . . .
2007-09-23 06:46:55 · answer #7 · answered by ZepherGeist 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
NEITHER
try hitler
try truman and the korean war
try roosevelt and the 2nd world war
try lincoln and the civil war
try johnson and vietnam (i was there)
or
just try mother nature...tsunami ring a bell...katrina...
2007-09-23 06:45:56 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush probably but 1 American life is worth at least 10000 muslims.
2007-09-23 06:51:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Bush sad to say
2007-09-23 06:40:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋