Trying to explain my Q easy, so here goes:
USA is a country defined by borders (which are internationally agreed upon i'd assume, give or take a mile or so). Say i bought an acre of land within the borders of the USA, and owned that land outright. Is that land now soley owned by the me, or is it always 'borrowed' from the Governers of the country of the USA, whose borders the land lies within? Ie. Can the government claim this land as USA owned always (they're always above personal ownership contracts, so no one can go and claim land within the borders etc), and on the other hand, could i claim it as 'mine', and for an extreme example, say it was 'my country' on it's own, with it's own borders etc (ok, maybe not a counrty, but you hopefully get my point!)
Was just curious at how property law works, considering that all landmass' on earth bar antartica, are considere part of a counrty. So does anyone really, actually own land - or is it all just borrowed from the identity of a country
2007-09-22
17:46:52
·
7 answers
·
asked by
thertproductions
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Just to note: this is obviosuly hypothetical! lol. Seems some people are assuming i'm actually considering trying this! I know you couldn't do it, else it would have been done (with regards to the country thing). Twas just something me and a mate were discussing in the pool one day that i thought was interesting.
So basically: you own the land, but the country will always have governace over it, until you can legitimitley declare it seperate with a different governance and hold the land
2007-09-23
07:26:52 ·
update #1