Did you realize this about Nationalized Healthcare???

Question

My dad told me about a situation that happened between him and a doctor yesterday.

He has been diagnosed as having high cholesteral and the doctor wrote him a prescription for a popular drug to control it. The doctor warned him however, that one of the possible side effects of the drug is that in certain people, it will case extreme muscule degeneration, which will in turn cause the destroyed tissue to travel by blood to the kidneys, which will also be destroyed. There is no way to forsee this until after it has happened, eventually leading to a paralysis-type state or death.

My dad refused the medication and has no other options as diet and exercise do not work either.

Now, what you need to realize is that, when looking at the many proposed frameworks for a Nationalized Healthcare Program, EVERY ONE will require that if a doctor prescribes medication, you do not have the right to refuse it.......

If you do refuse a medication or treatment, you will be automatically disqualified from the program. These people will then have to pick up private health insurance coverage.
The true problem is that now, your records show a pre-existing medical condition (high cholesterol in my dad’s case) which almost all private insurance WILL NOT COVER. So in other words then, my dad would be out of luck in getting any new treatment that might came about in the future unless he can pay out of pocket for it.
Put this in perspective. We all know that many cancer patients refuse certain treatments, but opt for others because of many personal reasons. Under Nationalized Healthcare, if they don’t agree with what their first, or even second doctor directs them to do, they are booted off the system and no insurance company in the world will pick up a person who has been diagnosed with cancer.

Take the pills and throw them away? Who is paying for those pills??? IT WOULD BE THE TAX PAYERS. I don't want to be paying taxes for stuff other people are going to throw away.

Answer 1

some are even denied some treatments due to cost. And sad to say, left to die

Answer 2

No I didn't realize that but I do realize the more the government gets involved in things the more messed up they get. A hundred years ago just about anyone could afford to have a doctor come to their house and treat them and they worked out a reasonable payment. Now we pay out the nose to insurance companies and then pay out the nose in taxes to support Medicaid and Medicare and for what? I still end up oweing money to the doctor because the doctor codes the treatment in such a way that it's not covered under my plan. Have you ever looked at a bill from the insurance company showing how much they paid for a service vs what you would pay for the same service without insurance? If we all paid that rate we might actually be able to afford medical care. Between insurance companies and malpractice lawsuits its amazing anyone can afford to go to the hospital these days. They say you get what you pay for but not when it comes to nationalized healthcare. You will pay and pay in taxes to have crappier coverage than you have now with doctors who are even less motivated to provide a good service. I believe everyone should have access to healthcare and I think we all could if doctors quit taking insurance and just charged the patient the insurance rate. I'd even pay a little more since I wouldnt be paying a small fortune each month in deductibles.

Answer 3

they warn everyone about to take statin drugs in the same way. when one of the drugs bothers someone, they try another one of the drugs. they are very effective. if you can take larger doses, they actually clean your arteries. the most serious problem is the liver. did you check the percentages of people that are affected by the statin drugs?

i thought that you were going to say that your dad's insurance wouldn't pay for it.

i work in a hospital, and have seen patients check themselves out because they disagree with treatment. sometimes, it is for silly reasons, like the hospital will not allow them to smoke on hospital property. most that disagree go to another doctor, however.

i bet that there are many people that would love to have your dad's insurance. and if this country ever gets a nat'l healthcare plan, you will really have to lock the borders. good luck.

Answer 4

First of all I think your story is BS.
There are many, I repeat many drugs on the market to control high cholestral. Even if the side effects you describe for the particular one are true, there are several others your dad could try.
Also, I seriously doubt such a drug with the side effects you describe exists or is even on the market.
And finally, you obviously do not understand the details of any nationalized healthcare proposals since NONE of the ones I've read carry any such terms as you describe.

Answer 5

the end results of it. i visit purely say this, if it wasn't for Britain's nationalised healthcare gadget i might have devoted suicide at sixteen. there is not any way with out the nationalised healthcare gadget of the united kingdom i could have been able to locate the money for my transition to become the authentic me, as my interest function beneficial properties me £4 hundred a month and my Mum disowned me. I slightly get through and if it weren't for the NHS i might particularly have killed myself through now. and you argument it provides the government license to make issues unlawful to maintain down wellness expenses. maximum international places with nationalised healthcare are loose international places. apart from drugs the government has banned little or no interior the united kingdom to maintain down wellness expenses. as properly as healthcare the NHS additionally runs an excellent form of community projects, collectively with some for the LGBT community. My query would have been centred generally on my gender identity dysphoria, yet think of of what share human beings can''t locate the money for clinical wellness insurance and healthcare, how a lot of human beings choose existence saving amenities yet can't get them via fact of a cost located in front of them. Nationalised healthcare facilitates human beings all have what they might desire to have a superb too. And back, it would not supply the government license to make issues unlawful to maintain down healthcare expenses. uk government hasn't finished it nor has the Canadian.

Answer 6

you know... you could just take the pills and throw them away... they're not going to watch you take them...

but I'm also sure there would be an appeals process... and there would be exceptions for certain procedures that have questionable benefits...

you're applying a VERY PRELIMINARY idea about these plans universally...

Answer 7

bottom line is ..
its not about the plan or the results of it..

its about the issue and its use in politics for gains and dirt slinging