why hasnt president bush been tried for his war crimes?

Question

600000 iraqis dead if I were u I'd help in the effort to impeach him and have him tried for war crimes.

Not to mention he uses the military to rape innocent civilians

Foxnews.com

Answer 1

Dummy, most of those dead Iraqis were pointing weapons at our guys. The rest were killed by their fanatical Islamic bretheren because they were the wrong branch of Islam.

All the US is doing there is replacing the law enforcement that WE destroyed during the war.

The only 'war crimes' are going on in the minds of idiot Leftist America haters.

Answer 2

Whoever is making $$ off this turmoil must be rather powerful if on the first day of Libs control opening agenda it was declared 'Impe__ment is off the table'.
As if there are no question and the door shut to this critical issue.

To the person below, one could argue an 'over-extension of Presidential authority', which has been and is taking place. You may want to put your future in a single person who's advisors and staff have made numerous blunders but the idea of Congress was to oversee the leader, something that is being writ out of our doctrine.

Answer 3

He hasn't committed any. I know you probably won't understand this , but it's really not unusual for people to die in a war. I want you to tell me exactly what crime he has committed. I keep asking this but nobody can answer it. All they can tell me is what in THEIR opinion they believe SHOULD be a crime. Nobody can tell me an actual crime that they can find in writing.

Answer 4

PRESIDENT George W, Bush HAS NOT committed any "War Crimes." He has NEVER used the US Military to raping innocent civillians!

Answer 5

Well if it isnt our old friend Ashley Meyers again.

I was going to ask you why you didnt post another US Marine bashing question, but I looked and it would seem that your once again on top of that.

Answer 6

Impeach yes, but there wouldn't be enough votes because of his party. Get off your crap about using the military to rape civilians, you're getting stupid now.

Answer 7

Semore!!!!! Is that you? are you on the computer again? Now, get in your jammies and take your medicine or Nurse Johnson will be forced to put you back in the padded room!!!! No get moving!!!!

Answer 8

Because the dems are spineless collaborators and America is full of the weak and infirm of the brain (see above answers). What is happening has our Founding Fathers rolling over in their graves.

Answer 9

Answer to your question:

If you were running the last remaining super power in the world you think anybody else could really do anything about it? No. Who can do something about it? The people of the US if they'd quit acting like asses and exercise their right to change how the country is running.

And by the way, he (Bush) is not ordering soldiers to rape people. That's only a few and unfornate bad apples.
------------------------
For everybody that doesn't say the war is illegal:

Did anybody take government in high school and pass? Because honestly, you folks know jack. I'll save you the trip of looking and just hook ya'll up. If you don't believe it, go do your homework for yourself.

Constitution ==(Pay attention to paragraph 2)==:

Article. VI.

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid
against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; AND ALL TREATIES MADE (*cough*== UN CHARTER == *cough*),
or which shall be made, UNDER the AUTHORITY of the United States, == SHALL BE the + SUPREME + LAW OF THE LAND ==; and the
Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
notwithstanding.

Ok, constitution, so what, right? This is the part where I cream my jeans, it's that good.

UNITED NATIONS CHARTER *hint* We're apart of it

Article 2, Section 3- 4. “All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered. .... [and] refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."

Violation. The US used force to settle its dispute with Iraq, ignoring calls from UN Security Council members for a peaceful resolution.

OH SNAP! Get eem!

Summary of Articles 39-50. Articles 39 - 50 of the United Nations Charter clearly stipulate that no member state is authorized to use military force against another country without the UN Security Council first determining that certain criteria have been met. (1) There must be a material breach of its resolution; and (2) All nonmilitary and peaceful options to enforce the resolution must be fully exhausted. Once it has been decided that the necessary conditions for military action have been met, only the UN Security Council can authorize the use of military force.

Emphasis on ONLY THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL CAN AUTHORIZE THE USE OF MILITARY FORCE and say it to yourself 10 times

Violation. The United States and its conscripted coalition invaded Iraq without the approval of the UN Security Council. The Bush administration chose not to take the issue to the council because it knew that a resolution to use force against Iraq would not pass.

GET EEEM!

Summary of Article 51. Article 51 allows for a nation to use military force to defend itself only in cases of an ongoing or impending attack. It only provides this military solution as a temporary one –until the UN Security Council can find the appropriate peaceful response. The intention of this article was not to set criteria for the justification of war. Quite the contrary; its intent was to prevent conflicts from escalating into war.

Violation. The US and its conscripted coalition invaded Iraq - calling it a preemptive defense strike, a concept with no legal meaning - despite being unable to prove its allegations that it posed an imminent threat to the US Although the US claimed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, that Iraq was developing these weapons, and that Iraq intended to use these weapons against the US, the US failed to provide any evidence to substantiate these claims. UN weapons inspectors who examined suspected banned weapons facilities in Iraq found no support for the US assertions. The US also alleged that Iraq had ties to terrorist groups and would likely provide these organizations with weapons of mass destruction. No evidence was presented to the UN to support the accusation.

GET EEM!

And I could go for days like this just droning on and on how the war is BLATANTLY illegal. It's not, "I believe it's illegal.." or, "I think," it is. Let me break it down IT IS ILLEGAL. Like the world is round, there is gravity, the earth revolves around the sun, and that it takes 3 licks to get to the center of a tootsie pop. Drop something and tell me there's no such thing as gravity. Exactly. I don't know what drugs you guys are taking but I want them.

Suspedor of disbelief (awesome name for comical reasons) "Dummy, most of those dead Iraqis were pointing weapons at our guys,"

Come to my house and I'll have a gun waiting for your ***, too.

And for all you crack heads that support the war, not the soldiers, join the military. Go to your local recruiter, swear in, grab a rifle. Until then, STFU. All about going to war, then you go. Everybody there wants to go home to their family and friends. They're done but you won't let them go back because you're stuck in your ignorant ways. Don't make them fight YOUR WAR. Quit your job, join up, full battle rattle, and take care of your business. Hate is a strong word but I hate you, people. So fricken' selfish.


And for you soldiers out there, specifically ARMY (FM-1), better read up.

Answer 10

Because he hasn't committed any. Educate yourself on what war crimes are before asking such a dumb question